Teams

Coulson/PH

2021 TUL ADULT 55 & Over League · 8.0 WOMEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-17vs Rahhal/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Frank / Kim Stewart vs Melissa Silkwood / Diane Wood4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSherry Fine / Kimberly Oliver vs Betsy Bryce / Michelle Hassell6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Allman / Terry Largent vs Joanie Bonfield Dinneen / Tammy Mathias7-5, 7-6
2021-06-15vs Wilson/PHSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSherry Fine / Kimberly Oliver vs Kimberly Jones / Cindy Noyes5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Frank / Janie Coulson vs Karen Orr / Beth Latham6-4, 6-0
2021-06-10vs Mullenix/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Frank / Terry Largent vs Theresa Nichols / Rebekah Herrick6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Fox / Janie Coulson vs Wendy Brooks / Melynda Stone6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSharon Cash / Glenda Bullock vs Elaine Leslie / Andrea Martin6-0, 7-5
2021-06-07vs Mullenix/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Allman / Terry Largent vs Theresa Nichols / Roxanna Hanseth6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Fox / Kim Stewart vs Vanessa Hutto / Andrea Martin6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJana Brookover / Susie Janowski vs Melynda Stone / Wendy Brooks6-1, 6-3
2021-06-03vs Hicks/TTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Allman / Laura Bailey vs Alyson Langholz / Jill Warnock6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJana Brookover / Kim Stewart vs Paula Marshall / Dana Peace2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-24vs Hicks/TTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Allman / Janie Coulson vs Nancy Hicks / Paula Marshall1-1
W#2 DoublesMary Fox / Laura Bailey vs Dana Peace / Joan Robson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJana Brookover / Glenda Bullock vs Jill Warnock / Lesli Frates7-5, 6-3
2021-05-01vs Wilson/PHLost 12
L#1 DoublesSherry Fine / Kimberly Oliver vs Gail Kelly / Cindy Noyes4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanie Coulson / Karen Frank vs Jackie Malone / Karen Orr6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMary Fox / Susie Janowski vs Kimberly Jones / Gail Gillock6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2021-04-17vs Rahhal/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesSherry Fine / Terry Largent vs Joanie Bonfield Dinneen / Tammy Mathias6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Frank / Kimberly Oliver vs Pam Rahhal / Diane Wood6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSharon Cash / Susie Janowski vs Betsy Bryce / Michelle Hassell3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Rahhal/LF712136137
2Coulson/PH6218614149
3Wilson/PH44121230223
4Hicks/TTC0822246280

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Laura Allman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.02
Sharon Cash
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Sherry Fine
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.30
Terry Largent
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Kimberly Oliver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Glenda Bullock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jana Brookover
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Janie Coulson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Karen Frank
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Laura Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Fox
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Susie Janowski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Fine + Laura Allman8457% games+3.6% vs expected
Terry Largent + Sherry Fine5551% games+2.2% vs expected
Sharon Cash + Sherry Fine151850% games−1.5% vs expected
Jana Brookover + Laura Allman5452% games−10.4% vs expected
Sharon Cash + Mary Fox4254% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Oliver + Sherry Fine3354% gamesnot enough data
Karen Frank + Janie Coulson5080% gamesnot enough data
Karen Frank + Jana Brookover3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Allman
57W–31L career · 8 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
4.05
Sharon Cash
52W–57L career · 3 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
4.02
Sherry Fine
81W–85L career · 7 lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.93
Terry Largent
100W–65L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Kimberly Oliver
80W–75L career · 4 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.17
3
Glenda Bullock
22W–30L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.55
Jana Brookover
49W–43L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Janie Coulson
42W–40L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Frank
65W–33L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Bailey
48W–21L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Fox
35W–29L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susie Janowski
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.