← Teams

GLVR-Byrd

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.28 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Spencer Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Valerie Truong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Monique Gill
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.16
Brandon Campos
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.09
Madison Scully
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.96
Richard Nobleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Todd Shupp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Alvin Lym
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Eric Delehoy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-12-06Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSpencer Byrd / Sarah Partch vs Jennifer Gwin / Alex Harbell6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMonique Gill / Brandon Campos vs Kathryn Harlan / David Vail6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEric Delehoy / Amory-Katelyn Zschach vs David Hubka / Diane Nelson6-4, 6-3
2024-11-23Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesSpencer Byrd / Monique Gill vs Paul Kim / Jamie Melton6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Partch / Brandon Campos vs Heidi Kjos / Steve DeKlotz7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAlvin Lym / Valerie Truong vs Penny Langhammer / Thomas Bollaert7-6, 7-6
2024-11-01Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesSpencer Byrd / Sarah Partch vs Margaret Jacobsen / Cory Heisterkamp6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRichard Nobleman / Madison Scully vs Vanessa Weber / Chase Stowell6-1, 6-2
2024-10-27Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesBrandon Campos / Melissa Dollar vs Jeremy Chiang / Michelle Vo7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlvin Lym / Sarah Partch vs Will Bayon / Cynthia Novac-Yu6-3, 6-4
2024-10-20Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBrandon Campos / Blythe Garma vs Kevin Allen / Diana Blebea6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRichard Nobleman / Madison Scully vs Cindy Bennett / Scott Quinn6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEric Delehoy / Amory-Katelyn Zschach vs Jacqueline Babb Milligan / Wes Milligan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-12Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSpencer Byrd / Valerie Truong vs Betty Koon / Peter Layzell7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Dollar / Richard Nobleman vs Diana Crawford / Dave Sato7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristine Vuong / Todd Shupp vs Lina Gao / Dano Ehler6-2, 6-3
2024-09-14Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesSarah Partch / Brandon Campos vs Jeffrey Bayless / Jennifer Bayless7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMadison Scully / Richard Nobleman vs Christin Harrington / Stephen Chen6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBlythe Garma / Alvin Lym vs Heidi Cronn / Brian Chenoweth4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBrandon Campos / Monique Gill vs David Williams / Suki Birge7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRichard Nobleman / Madison Scully vs Robert Hesslink / Theresa Hagerty7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTodd Shupp / Amory-Katelyn Zschach vs Kerry Forsell / Fred Sutardjo7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Spencer Byrd
82W–43L career
0%54%46%
3.60
3.5
Valerie Truong
15W–12L career · type S
0%93%7%
3.42
3.5
Monique Gill
33W–23L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Brandon Campos
38W–46L career
4%96%0%
3.16
3.5
Madison Scully
27W–32L career
14%86%0%
3.09
3
Richard Nobleman
51W–36L career
0%87%13%
2.96
3
Todd Shupp
28W–22L career
0%98%2%
2.84
3
Alvin Lym
36W–31L career
0%99%1%
2.84
3
Eric Delehoy
17W–11L career
2%97%0%
2.73

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.