Teams

Apex:PrimeTime:Wooden

2023 ME Adult 65 & Over Women · 7.0 65 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-15vs Apex:NetAssets:DoyleWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Mathieu / Christiane Villedrouin vs Diana Doyle / Charlotte Pease6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGwen Lambert / Susan Steinman vs Nancy Osborne / Jill Craft6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLiz Winfeld / Julie Wooden vs Anita Johnston / Laurie Burger3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-08vs Apex:NetAssets:DoyleWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Mathieu / Christiane Villedrouin vs Nancy Osborne / Heidi Rentz6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Wooden / Ellen Groleau vs Jill Craft / Rebecca Love7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Steinman / Liz Winfeld vs Anita Johnston / Laurie Burger6-2, 6-3
2023-06-08vs Apex:NetAssets:DoyleWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristiane Villedrouin / Barbara Boyce vs Charlotte Pease / Diana Doyle7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGwen Lambert / Ellen Groleau vs Heidi Rentz / Marsha Traill6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Mathieu / Roma Bonnin vs Jill Craft / Anita Johnston6-3, 6-2
2023-06-01vs Apex:NetAssets:DoyleWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Mathieu / Barbara Boyce vs Laurie Burger / Jill Craft6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Wooden / Carol Epstein vs Diana Doyle / Rebecca Love6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRoma Bonnin / Liz Winfeld vs Heidi Rentz / Nancy Osborne3-6, 2-6
2023-05-26vs Apex:NetAssets:DoyleWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristiane Villedrouin / Diane Mathieu vs Charlotte Pease / Elaine Dube6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarol Epstein / Ellen Groleau vs Jill Craft / Diana Doyle6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Wooden / Gwen Lambert vs Caroline Pratt / Anita Johnston6-3, 7-5
2023-05-18vs Apex:NetAssets:DoyleWon 21
W#1 DoublesGwen Lambert / Barbara Boyce vs Diana Doyle / Jill Craft6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Epstein / Ellen Groleau vs Heidi Rentz / Marsha Traill6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRoma Bonnin / Susan Steinman vs Charlotte Pease / Rebecca Love2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 7.0 65 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Apex:PrimeTime:Wooden601539133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Susan Steinman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Gwen Lambert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Diane Mathieu
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Christiane Villedrouin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Barbara Boyce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Julie Wooden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Carol Epstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ellen Groleau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roma Bonnin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Epstein + Susan Steinman191156% games+6.4% vs expected
Julie Wooden + Susan Steinman24463% games+4.3% vs expected
Christiane Villedrouin + Diane Mathieu30960% games+3.2% vs expected
Susan Steinman + Christiane Villedrouin9264% games+0.2% vs expected
Gwen Lambert + Susan Steinman6163% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Groleau + Julie Wooden5154% gamesnot enough data
Gwen Lambert + Diane Mathieu5161% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Groleau + Gwen Lambert3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Steinman
93W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Gwen Lambert
140W–121L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Diane Mathieu
54W–19L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Christiane Villedrouin
73W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Barbara Boyce
12W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Wooden
84W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Carol Epstein
65W–55L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
Ellen Groleau
59W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Roma Bonnin
18W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.