Teams

FK - Hatfield

2024 Marion Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-06vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Flanagan / Nancy Fetzer vs Yvonne Schappell / Linda Jones4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Hatfield / Pamela Plumlee vs Valerie Elvin / Beth Riendeau3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Garrick / Donna Jarvis vs Karyn Dolan / Terry Shick2-6, 2-6
2024-02-29vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesPamela Plumlee / Kathy Hatfield vs Beverly Gates / Terry Shick6-3, 6-4
2024-02-21vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLaura Flanagan / Nancy Fetzer vs Yvonne Schappell / Rene Stinnett6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Garrick / Kathy Hatfield vs Erica Migliorati / Linda Jones6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-02-07vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Flanagan / Susan Garrick vs Yvonne Schappell / Rene Stinnett5-7, 0-6
2024-02-01vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Flanagan / Linda Lademann vs Beverly Gates / Patti Hischmann3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarianne Marcoux / Kathy Hatfield vs Linda Jones / Erica Migliorati0-6, 0-6
2024-01-24vs Marion/Schappell/65&Over8.0WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLaura Flanagan / Nancy Fetzer vs Diane Stablein / Valerie Elvin2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Garrick / Kathy Hatfield vs Patti Hischmann / Sherry Ruschell4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Kay Conway
published
3.47
3.46
Marianne Marcoux
published
3.28
Laura Flanagan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.15
Kathy Hatfield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Donna Jarvis
published
Jan Cole
published
Linda Lademann
published
Nancy Fetzer
published
Nancy Little
published
Pamela Plumlee
published
Susan Garrick
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Flanagan + Susan Garrick3548% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kay Conway
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.70
Kimberly Scudder Thompson
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Marianne Marcoux
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Laura Flanagan
30W–59L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Kathy Hatfield
60W–73L career · 10 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Donna Jarvis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jan Cole
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Lademann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Fetzer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Little
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pamela Plumlee
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Garrick
52W–70L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.