Teams

LATA40/Rangel/CAMP

2025 Combo 40 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-24vs LATA40/Swalgren/LCTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJane Rangel / Jeanette Mangels vs Amanda Turpin / Corrina Kleemoff1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Nicholson / Wendel Franklin vs Chris Lefebvre / Janet Buhrow6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTeresa Tracy / Kay Wescott vs Karen Caruso / Traci Gilden1-6, 0-6
2025-09-03vs LATA40/Sutton/CTFCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJane Rangel / Jeanette Mangels vs Carmen Goulet / Joann Brennan2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Butts Foy / Jennifer Wild vs Natasha Wright / Quandolyn Frierson0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Zupon / Wendel Franklin vs Kris Sutton / Gena McCoy6-2, 6-4
2025-08-20vs LATA40/Swalgren/LCTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Mathews / Kay Wescott vs Karen Caruso / Terri Vick-Phillips6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Downs / Amy Barnes vs Lori Yuris / Cecilia Nilsson2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Butts Foy / Wendel Franklin vs Traci Gilden / Chris Lefebvre6-4, 6-4
2025-07-30vs LATA40/Sutton/CTFCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJane Rangel / Jennifer Wild vs Devin Koop / Natasha Wright1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Howker Amick / Susan Mathews vs Vivian Wych / Christine Clements4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Zupon / Leslie Downs vs Cindy Mills / Cathy Greenwood6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Nancy Butts Foy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Sarah Zupon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Paula Howker Amick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Courtney Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Jane Rangel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Susan Mathews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Kay Wescott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Teresa Tracy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Barnes
published 3.5
3.23
Jennifer Wild
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Leslie Downs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Wendel Franklin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jeanette Mangels
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jessica Hallman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Howker Amick + Jane Rangel9655% games+0.3% vs expected
Kay Wescott + Paula Howker Amick7448% games−1.3% vs expected
Nancy Butts Foy + Sarah Zupon8948% games−3.1% vs expected
Amy Barnes + Sarah Zupon101149% games−4.8% vs expected
Nancy Butts Foy + Kay Wescott5249% games−7.5% vs expected
Nancy Butts Foy + Courtney Nicholson72442% games−10.3% vs expected
Jane Rangel + Sarah Zupon134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Butts Foy + Paula Howker Amick123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Butts Foy
76W–104L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Sarah Zupon
69W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Paula Howker Amick
53W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Courtney Nicholson
8W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Jane Rangel
29W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Susan Mathews
39W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Kay Wescott
66W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Teresa Tracy
44W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amy Barnes
25W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Wild
14W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Leslie Downs
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Wendel Franklin
27W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Jeanette Mangels
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Hallman
44W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.