Teams

CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC CW6.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesKumiko Takamatsu / Kanchan Patalay vs Ieda Garcia / Hyeyun Jeong6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Chen / Grace Haig vs Ashley Unyoung Kim / Hwayeon Park6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRenisa Satrijo / Sandra Pelino vs Hyo Jung Han / Yuhong Huang3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKanchan Patalay / Tara O'Grady vs Hyeyun Jeong / Jiyoun Noh6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSandra Pelino / Karen Chen vs Ieda Garcia / Ashley Unyoung Kim6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChie Imperato / Janani Vasudevan vs Yan Gong / Youjin Kim6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Chie Imperato
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Kanchan Patalay
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Kumiko Takamatsu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Jennie Bader
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Grace Haig
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Dongmei Cao
published 3.5
3.08
Sayoko Gibbs
published
3.05
Janani Vasudevan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Sandra Pelino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Karen Chen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Elaine Chiu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Renisa Satrijo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Rosemary Go
published
2.83
Mary Beth Huey
published
2.67
Elizabeth Grover
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennie Bader + Dongmei Cao4254% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Pelino + Kanchan Patalay033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chie Imperato
3W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Kanchan Patalay
9W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Kumiko Takamatsu
6W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Jennie Bader
9W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Grace Haig
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Dongmei Cao
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Sayoko Gibbs
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
Janani Vasudevan
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.05
Sandra Pelino
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Karen Chen
24W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
3.5
Elaine Chiu
8W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Renisa Satrijo
8W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Rosemary Go
24W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
Mary Beth Huey
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Elizabeth Grover
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.