Teams

Egger/Nelson

2025 South East Tennis Combo 18 & OVER · Women 8.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-01vs Young 8.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Thomas / Kristin Main vs Cassie Causey / Anna Porcelli3-6, 2-6
2025-09-22vs AtterburyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Main / Sarah Thomas vs Lisa Sottung / Lisa Phelps6-0, 6-2
2025-09-15vs Haskins18Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Beatty / Kristin Main vs Caitlynn Goheen / Lori Haskins6-0, 6-1
2025-09-13vs Young 8.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKristin Main / Anne Egger vs Helen Mathias-Hinson / Taylor Waddle6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-03vs AtterburyWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Thomas / Kristin Main vs Candy Pegram / Lisa Gilbert6-3, 6-2
2025-08-18vs Young 8.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Thomas / Kristin Main vs Tari Ann Toro-Steinmetz / Lindsay Parker4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Elizabeth Eakin
published
4.26
Kristin Main
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.24
Adrienne Beatty
published 4.5
4.11
Rachel Bonfiglio
published
4.01
Karen McCarty
published
3.80
Kaitlin Bailey
published
3.75
Janet Waren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Ashley DeGroote
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Anne Egger
published 4
3.64
Barbara Caropolo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Anna Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen McCarty + Anne Egger6154% games−3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Eakin
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Kristin Main
123W–55L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Adrienne Beatty
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.24
Rachel Bonfiglio
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
Karen McCarty
21W–10L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
Kaitlin Bailey
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.80
Janet Waren
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Ashley DeGroote
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Anne Egger
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Barbara Caropolo
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
4
Anna Taylor
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.