Teams

SATA/Kay Buelvas

2024 · 2025 SATA USTA Adult 55 & Over (Women) - Fall

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-25vs DP - YontzWon 20
W#2 DoublesBetsey Andersen / Claire ODonnell vs Ann Grant / Carol Herringer6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKay Buelvas / Sharon Rowlett vs Deborah Cannon / Patricia Vierheilig7-5, 6-4
2024-10-06vs Landings - AllenWon 21
L#1 DoublesBarbara Capes / Lisa Mulherin vs Lauren Kaplow / Ida Zeger1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLeigh Givens-Ulmer / Betsey Andersen vs Anita Seipel / Dana Beringer6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKay Buelvas / Jodi Holmes vs Carla Blumenthal / Trudy Sack6-0, 6-4
2024-10-04vs SATA/Judith BuxbaumSplit 11
L#2 DoublesClaire ODonnell / Lisa Mulherin vs Kathy Wilson / Jan Gomez7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Mihok / Liz Hagen vs Camille Lee / Wendy Schroeder6-3, 6-0
2024-09-20vs CRC - HarrisWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaire ODonnell / Sharon Rowlett vs Regina Graham / Donna Abbott6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLiz Hagen / Leigh Givens-Ulmer vs Paula Parrish / Debra Niven6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKay Buelvas / Jodi Holmes vs Mairi Reynolds / Mary Jo Hogan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-09-13vs SCC - Greco/ShealyWon 21
L#1 DoublesBetsey Andersen / Liz Hagen vs Susan Missroon / Virginia Shealy3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBarbara Capes / Lisa Mulherin vs Indie Harris / Linda Trull6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKay Buelvas / Christine Mihok vs Lisa Harper / Suzanne Swinson7-5, 4-3
2024-09-11vs Landings - BishopSplit 11
W#2 DoublesClaire ODonnell / Sharon Rowlett vs Grace Cause / Dawn Sabin6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa McCaslin / Christine Mihok vs Diane Oxnard / Karen Haase4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 SATA USTA Adult 55 & Over (Women) - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Claire ODonnell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Betsey Andersen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Liz Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Leigh Givens-Ulmer
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
3.32
Christine Mihok
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Barbara Capes
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.20
Sharon Rowlett
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.14
Kay Buelvas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Jodi Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Lisa McCaslin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Mulherin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire ODonnell + Betsey Andersen18662% games+3.9% vs expected
Leigh Givens-Ulmer + Barbara Capes171156% games+2.0% vs expected
Barbara Capes + Liz Hagen3354% games−5.4% vs expected
Kay Buelvas + Sharon Rowlett2541% games−20.8% vs expected
Christine Mihok + Liz Hagen5068% gamesnot enough data
Lisa McCaslin + Kay Buelvas134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa McCaslin + Jodi Holmes033 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Holmes + Liz Hagen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claire ODonnell
24W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.59
3.5
Betsey Andersen
23W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Liz Hagen
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Leigh Givens-Ulmer
45W–35L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Christine Mihok
12W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Barbara Capes
30W–27L career · 13 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Sharon Rowlett
10W–19L career · 11 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Kay Buelvas
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
Jodi Holmes
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Lisa McCaslin
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.92
Lisa Mulherin
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.