Teams

LCTA18/Frailey/LTP-DI

LCTA 18 & Over Fall League · 18 & over Fall League Women 2.5 Day

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-09vs LCTA18/BARNES-SEAMAN/CCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSandie Johnston / April Wood vs Hillary Bennett / Susanna Zeigler4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Vernon vs Eleanor Gray5-7, 0-6
2023-10-25vs LCTA18/Barnes/CCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathryn Frailey / Ashli Burns vs Nicole Barnes / Lindsey Carter2-6, 0-6
2023-09-20vs LCTA18/Ledlie/MaybankLost 02
L#1 DoublesBene Rittenberg / Ashli Burns vs Caroline Ledlie / Deborah Looper3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Frailey / April Wood vs Stephanie Moore / Julie Goldin1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 18 & over Fall League Women 2.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA18/Heinemann/Wild Dunes000000
2LCTA18/Barnes/CCC000000
3LCTA18/Benson-Frick/Park West000000
4LCTA18/Reed/Creekside000000
5LCTA18/Ellis/Hamlin000000
6LCTA18/Frailey/LTP-DI000000
7LCTA18/Griesemer-Lawrimore/CTC000000
8LCTA18/Earls/LTPDI000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.57
Lisa Grimmer
published
2.48
April Wood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.33
Ashli Burns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.33
Lindsey Arena
published
2.24
Robin Russell
published
2.24
Sarah Vernon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.24
Andrea Cline
published 2.5
1.98
Kathryn Frailey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashli Burns + Robin Russell4259% games+22.8% vs expected
Robin Russell + Sarah Vernon4647% games+6.0% vs expected
Robin Russell + Lindsey Arena044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Grimmer + Lindsey Arena213 matchesnot enough data
Ashli Burns + Sarah Vernon123 matchesnot enough data
April Wood + Sarah Vernon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Grimmer
53W–69L career · no lines in 2026
0%32%68%
2.57
2.5
April Wood
27W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Ashli Burns
28W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Lindsey Arena
22W–46L career · no lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Robin Russell
30W–45L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Sarah Vernon
21W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Andrea Cline
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Kathryn Frailey
2W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.