Teams

BROADSTONE RC CW6.5B

2023 COMBO · Women 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Elaine Yap
published
3.25
Christina Charn
published 3.5
3.25
Lisa Martucci-Gibbs
published
3.18
Gladys Cornell
published
3.18
Denise Chisick
published 3.5
3.14
Betty Williams
published 3.5
3.13
Maggie Mei Choy
published
3.12
Juliana Long
published
2.91
Jeannine Neves
published
2.87
Andrea Shaw
published 3
2.83
Janet Souza
published
2.77
Kim Vargas
published
2.71
Amanda Fernandez
published 3
Judy Kuhl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Shaw + Janet Souza4152% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elaine Yap
21W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Christina Charn
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Lisa Martucci-Gibbs
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
Gladys Cornell
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Denise Chisick
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Betty Williams
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Maggie Mei Choy
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Juliana Long
18W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.12
Jeannine Neves
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Andrea Shaw
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
2.87
Janet Souza
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
2.83
Kim Vargas
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Amanda Fernandez
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Judy Kuhl
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.