Teams

GSTL18/Whiteside/Stables

2024 Combo 18 & Over-GSTL · Adult Women - 7.5

21 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Erica Umpierrez
published
Alice Whiteside
published 4
Alison Hayes
published 4
3.73
Nikola Faust
published
3.64
Amanda Drosieko
published 4
3.64
Camilla Parker
published 4
3.31
Elle Jones
published
3.29
Kylie Vaughn
published
3.18
Doreen Cribb
published
3.16
Tara Crammer
published
3.10
Polly McCray
published
3.03
Linda Lane
published
3.03
Glenn Wilcox
published
2.99
Tyler Easterling
published
2.97
Marguerite Oliver
published
2.82
Kelly Cox
published
2.70
Shayne Matthews
published
Kerri Evans
published
Lydia O'Halloran
published
Stella Mercado
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camilla Parker + Erica Umpierrez4260% games+14.3% vs expected
Tara Crammer + Stella Mercado8261% games+6.3% vs expected
Doreen Cribb + Camilla Parker3250% games−7.7% vs expected
Camilla Parker + Nikola Faust4170% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Drosieko + Tara Crammer123 matchesnot enough data
Doreen Cribb + Kylie Vaughn213 matchesnot enough data
Doreen Cribb + Elle Jones303 matchesnot enough data
Linda Lane + Polly McCray123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erica Umpierrez
20W–4L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Alice Whiteside
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Alison Hayes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nikola Faust
20W–3L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
3.73
4
Amanda Drosieko
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Camilla Parker
32W–14L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Elle Jones
21W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.31
Kylie Vaughn
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.29
Doreen Cribb
32W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.18
Tara Crammer
31W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.16
Polly McCray
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Linda Lane
23W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
Glenn Wilcox
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Tyler Easterling
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
Marguerite Oliver
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Kelly Cox
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.82
Shayne Matthews
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Kerri Evans
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lydia O'Halloran
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Elizabeth Klein
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stella Mercado
13W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.