Teams

VALENTINE/40/3.0/MX/LCRC

2026 Lake Charles Mixed 40 & Over · 3.0 LC (40&O) Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-21vs Keating/40/3.0/MX/LCRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatt Beaugh / Brittany Black vs Brett Carlisle / Mona Hastings5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCHRISTY VALENTINE / Mark Valentine vs Glenn Bruno / Wendy Harper6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBeau James Faul / Maria Faul vs Matthew Keating / Amanda Keating2-6, 2-6
2026-06-18vs Keating/40/3.0/MX/LCRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBridget Vita / Nathanial Washington vs Daphne Simoneaux / Derek Poncho4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCHRISTY VALENTINE / Mark Valentine vs Cathleen Bourg / Charles Bourg3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRachel Lindgren / Mitch Redd vs Matthew Keating / Amanda Keating3-6, 1-6
2026-06-07vs Keating/40/3.0/MX/LCRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Etherton / Rachel Lindgren vs Daphne Simoneaux / Derek Poncho3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrittany Black / Nathanial Washington vs Cathleen Bourg / Charles Bourg6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMitch Redd / Jennifer Black vs Matthew Keating / Mona Hastings4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-31vs Keating/40/3.0/MX/LCRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatt Beaugh / Bridget Vita vs Mona Hastings / Brett Carlisle1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Lindgren / Chris Etherton vs Dean Padgett Jr / Wendy Harper5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Black / Nathanial Washington vs Amanda Ihli / Glenn Bruno6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-17vs Keating/40/3.0/MX/LCRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatt Beaugh / Bridget Vita vs Dean Padgett Jr / Mona Hastings6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChris Etherton / Jennifer Black vs Glenn Bruno / Daphne Simoneaux6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBeau James Faul / Maria Faul vs Charles Bourg / Cathleen Bourg0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 LC (40&O) Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Keating/40/3.0/MX/LCRC419616142
2VALENTINE/40/3.0/MX/LCRC146921160

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Bridget Vita
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Rachel Lindgren
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
CHRISTY VALENTINE
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Brittany Black
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Beau James Faul
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Matt Beaugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Nathanial Washington
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Chris Etherton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Maria Faul
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Mark Valentine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Mitch Redd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

CHRISTY VALENTINE + Mark Valentine3446% games+0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bridget Vita
19W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Rachel Lindgren
22W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
CHRISTY VALENTINE
13W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Brittany Black
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Beau James Faul
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matt Beaugh
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Nathanial Washington
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Chris Etherton
10W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Maria Faul
14W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Mark Valentine
13W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Mitch Redd
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.