Teams

ACOPI:KennebecRally:Hamel

2023 ME Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-08vs MRC:LoveMeansNothing:ArauWon 21
L#1 DoublesDevin Lachapelle / Kathleen Tarbuck vs Alex Arau / Peggy Doucette7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Hamel / Karen Boston vs Pamela Wallace / Colby Arau6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRachael Elias / Theodore Faugno vs Marianna Moll / Mer Doucette6-4, 6-1
2023-04-02vs ATC:MixedNuts2:LewisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Hamel / Kathleen Tarbuck vs Paul Potvin / Connie Potvin6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Saulter / Devin Lachapelle vs Brooke Miller / Frank Willard5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Morancy / Hunter Morancy vs Ellen Groleau / Daniel Johnston6-0, 6-1
2023-04-02vs ETC:TBD:RobidouxWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathleen Tarbuck / Ryan Nored vs Karen Robidoux / Arthur Jodrey3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesHunter Morancy / Linda Saulter vs Patricia Persson / David Persson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Morancy / Louis Gingras vs Brandon Leighton / Amy Jackson6-4, 6-3
2023-03-19vs MRC:LoveMeansNothing:ArauWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Boston / Ryan Nored vs Sante Calandri / Peggy Doucette1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDevin Lachapelle / Linda Saulter vs Pat Behling / Lana Arau6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLouis Gingras / Julie Morancy vs Marianna Moll / Mer Doucette6-1, 6-1
2023-03-19vs ACOPI:OnTarget:HolmWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Boston / Michael Hamel vs Hilary Holm / Thomas Bartol6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRachael Elias / Theodore Faugno vs Daniel Bence / Ann Theriault6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Morancy / Hunter Morancy vs Mikaela Rainey / Peter MacDonald2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-02-19vs ACOPI:OnTarget:HolmWon 30
W#1 DoublesDevin Lachapelle / Kathleen Tarbuck vs Mikaela Rainey / Alexander Stern4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Hamel / Karen Boston vs Malcolm Avore / Barbara Moss5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHunter Morancy / Julie Morancy vs Nikko Noble / Kaylee Bates6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-08vs ATC:MixedNuts2:LewisWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Boston / Ryan Nored vs Jason Therrien / Brooke Miller1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarc Cyr / Kathleen Tarbuck vs Bryan Lewis / Suzanne Lewis6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Hamel / Rachael Elias vs Daniel Johnston / Catherine Lemin6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 7.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WOOD:DoubleShots:Yoon8019514186
2ACOPI:KennebecRally:Hamel7017415150
3ACOPI:OnTarget:Holm6216819184
4Apex:Swingers:Green5318614175
5Apex:GripNRip:Bowring44131124211
6ATC:MixedNuts2:Lewis3471432213
7MRC:LoveMeansNothing:Arau26101430243
8Apex:NetThreats:Crosby2661837261
9CLC:WinJammers:Harris1742041269
10ETC:TBD:Robidoux0641430197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Michael Hamel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.67
Hunter Morancy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.32
Karen Boston
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.20
Kathleen Tarbuck
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Linda Saulter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Devin Lachapelle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Morancy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Louis Gingras
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marc Cyr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rachael Elias
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ryan Nored
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Theodore Faugno
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Nored + Karen Boston141350% games+7.2% vs expected
Karen Boston + Michael Hamel6162% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Tarbuck + Marc Cyr2546% gamesnot enough data
Hunter Morancy + Julie Morancy404 matchesnot enough data
Hunter Morancy + Linda Saulter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Hamel
75W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Hunter Morancy
33W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Karen Boston
42W–39L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Kathleen Tarbuck
23W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Linda Saulter
27W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
Devin Lachapelle
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Morancy
13W–7L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Louis Gingras
27W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marc Cyr
40W–47L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Rachael Elias
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Nored
48W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Theodore Faugno
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.