Teams

MAC-Leedy

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.92 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Yascha Noonberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
Reza Kafi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.84
Alex Young
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Libby North
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Joe Conyard
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.67
Linda Lovett
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Christian Casebeer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Catherine Go
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Jeanette Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Michelle Posey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.22
Tuan Truong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Zachary Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2021-11-21Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTuan Truong / Libby North vs Heidi Wilcox / Vincent Lee2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-11-12Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChristian Casebeer / Linda Lovett vs Deepak Selvanathan / Molly Shum6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTuan Truong / Jeanette Thomas vs Ajay Kumar Tippisetti / Kristie Leake7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2021-11-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Zachary Wright vs Brad Ouderkirk / Claire Tirapelle6-2, 6-0
2021-10-29Lost 03
L#1 DoublesZachary Wright / Kim Wright vs Karen Ohollaren / Hector M Salomon6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Lovett / Tuan Truong vs Michelle Beilstein / Michael Chang5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Christian Casebeer vs Brian Dehen / Chanon Ogden6-2, 6-4
2021-10-24Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Go / Reza Kafi vs Heather Watkins / James Feeney6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSheila Anderson / Joe Conyard vs Krista Mikalatos / Raj Patel6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Posey / Alex Young vs Karen Pickering / Prasad Kenkaraseril6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-22Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJoe Conyard / Sheila Anderson vs Kaelin Teo / Gregg Palmer7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesYascha Noonberg / Jeanette Thomas vs Tao Hua / Zhitong Chen6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesZachary Wright / Libby North vs Kristen Benkstein / NANDA SIDDAIAH4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-10-03Won 21
W#1 DoublesSheila Anderson / Joe Conyard vs Rebecca McMasters / Jonathan Quon6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Yascha Noonberg vs Ellen Pearson / Albert Hensley6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Reza Kafi vs Kris Kelly-Koster / Adam Hutchinson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Yascha Noonberg
43W–46L career
3%96%1%
4.16
4
Reza Kafi
50W–26L career
1%91%8%
3.85
4
Alex Young
42W–22L career
0%96%3%
3.84
4
Libby North
51W–49L career
0%99%1%
3.78
4
Joe Conyard
52W–50L career
not enough data
4
Linda Lovett
93W–105L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Christian Casebeer
36W–57L career
16%83%1%
3.64
4
Catherine Go
87W–77L career
18%82%0%
3.58
4
Jeanette Thomas
89W–74L career
40%60%0%
3.48
4
Michelle Posey
76W–43L career
45%55%0%
3.47
3.5
Tuan Truong
30W–64L career
2%98%0%
3.22
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–142L career
3%97%0%
3.17
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.