Teams

Georgetown (Jennifer Beebe)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 4.5 Women (Arrie Lugar)

22 players · average NTRP 4.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Women (Arrie Lugar) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Marielba Zambrano
published
4.36
Martha Fair
published
4.34
Jennifer Beebe
published
4.30
Katie Weaver
published
Ashley Kuehnne
published 4.5
CLAUDIA MUCINO
published 4.5
4.20
Belsaid Aguirre
published 4.5
4.19
Holly Blake
published
4.16
Erin Mowrer
published
4.04
Kelly Westrom
published
4.00
Camille Bax
published 4
3.99
Katherine Kardian
published
3.99
Elsa Cecilia Gomez
published
3.91
Anna Alvarez
published 4
3.77
Donna Glick
published
Elizabeth Lear
published
Lauren Woods
published
Renee McDonald
published
Shelly DeChabert
published
Suzanne Hanks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Fair + Jennifer Beebe7358% games+5.1% vs expected
CLAUDIA MUCINO + Anna Alvarez13363% games+3.5% vs expected
Shelly DeChabert + Marielba Zambrano7158% games+3.0% vs expected
Erin Mowrer + Kelly Westrom3447% games−3.4% vs expected
Belsaid Aguirre + Marielba Zambrano14850% games−3.6% vs expected
Marielba Zambrano + Elsa Cecilia Gomez033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marielba Zambrano
45W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
4.37
Martha Fair
30W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
4.36
Jennifer Beebe
47W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
4.34
Katie Weaver
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Ashley Kuehnne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
CLAUDIA MUCINO
13W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Belsaid Aguirre
32W–22L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
4.20
Holly Blake
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Erin Mowrer
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
Kelly Westrom
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.04
4
Camille Bax
15W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
Katherine Kardian
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
Elsa Cecilia Gomez
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Anna Alvarez
45W–33L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Caroline Fredericks
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Donna Glick
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elizabeth Lear
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Browne-Payne
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Woods
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Renee McDonald
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelly DeChabert
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne Hanks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.