Teams

Ch.Hochstrasser40A

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-20vs An.Redmond40AWon 40
W#1 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Garnett Webb vs Gina Hartness / Monika Ahmad6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNiezle Scott vs Stephanie Lee6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesApril Lyon / Diana Kennedy vs Anne Redmond / Abigail Weaver6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarjorie Diaz / Mary Hellner vs Dora Reed / Heath Hilliker6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-05-13vs Er.Hemminger40ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / April Lyon vs Melanie Hewitt / Erin Hemminger2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMary Hellner / Marjorie Diaz vs Michele Lagerstedt / Tina Dahir4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-05-06vs Hop.Pflaum40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Hofmann / Christa Hochstrasser vs Angela Coolidge / Candice Kish2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNiezle Scott vs LaDonna Lee6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Kelly Kelly vs Karen Foster / Heather Mills3-6, 2-6
2025-04-29vs As.Walker40ALost 03
L#1 DoublesLee Berrios-Smothers / April Lyon vs Griffin Lamb / Liza Eaton3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGarnett Webb / McGavock Edwards vs Katherine Seawell-Lewis / Betsy Fulcher1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Austin / Mary Hellner vs Theresa Critcher / Tiffany Thompson3-6, 0-6
2025-04-15vs Sh.Peck40AWon 10
W#2 DoublesLee Berrios-Smothers / Diana Kennedy vs Blair Cassimus / Melissa Pereira5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-08vs We.Bargoil40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesLee Berrios-Smothers / Christa Hochstrasser vs Kate Rigsbee / Amy DiGiuseppe6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Mary Hellner vs Wendy Bargoil / Jennifer Viscosi6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-25vs Ki.Lamm40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Garnett Webb vs Jennifer Roche / Lisa Hawreluk4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNiezle Scott vs Heather Rigney6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Chavez / April Lyon vs Christine Dukiet / Susie Albion6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-18vs Ca.Beaird40ALost 01
L#2 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Niezle Scott vs Inma Navarro Galisteo / Dana Aderhold6-7, 6-7
2025-03-11vs Je.Solomon40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesMcGavock Edwards / Garnett Webb vs Sarah Hoffman / Jennifer Kimball7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Diaz / Mary Hellner vs Perry LeGaux / Corinne Alavi6-3, 6-2
2025-03-04vs Al.Dugan40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesChrista Hochstrasser / Lee Berrios-Smothers vs Kelly Blevins / Sarah Ferguson6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Lee Berrios-Smothers
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.85
Niezle Scott
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Heather Hofmann
published
2.80
Garnett Webb
published
2.75
Amber Bruner
published 3
2.68
April Lyon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Mary Hellner
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.65
McGavock Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Marjorie Diaz
published
2.56
Christa Hochstrasser
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.54
Catherine Chavez
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christa Hochstrasser + Niezle Scott2346% games−4.3% vs expected
Christa Hochstrasser + Garnett Webb2445% games−4.3% vs expected
Lee Berrios-Smothers + April Lyon1545% gamesnot enough data
Christa Hochstrasser + McGavock Edwards134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Hellner + Marjorie Diaz224 matchesnot enough data
Lee Berrios-Smothers + Christa Hochstrasser123 matchesnot enough data
Christa Hochstrasser + Mary Hellner123 matchesnot enough data
April Lyon + Heather Hofmann213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lee Berrios-Smothers
78W–107L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Niezle Scott
39W–38L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Heather Hofmann
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Garnett Webb
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Amber Bruner
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
April Lyon
118W–138L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Mary Hellner
55W–63L career · 8 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
3
McGavock Edwards
59W–88L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.65
Marjorie Diaz
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
2.61
3
Christa Hochstrasser
68W–118L career · 7 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Catherine Chavez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.