Teams

LTC-M RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMandy Staehler / Crystal Burkhart vs Madeline Schymanski / Emily Scarbrough4-6, 2-6
2023-08-30vs NJ PURPLESplit 11
W#1 DoublesAllison Abrams / Molly Burke vs Kristin Walters / Laura Garrido6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMandy Staehler vs Pamela Johnstone0-6, 2-6
2023-08-23vs RHCC BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesMolly Burke / Allison Abrams vs Abbey Wood / Terri Whitehair6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMandy Staehler / Crystal Burkhart vs Briana Jackson / Corinne Packard2-6, 1-6
2023-08-16vs MVCC GOLDLost 01
L#1 SinglesLisa Hoogendoorn Daniel vs Molly Nelson0-6, 1-6
2023-08-09vs MC NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesGina Cozza / Lisa Hoogendoorn Daniel vs Annmarie Oien / Keelia Corcoran4-6, 4-6
2023-08-02vs BP ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesAllison Abrams / Molly Burke vs Clarissa Manzi / Nancy Zhong6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Aliffi / Mandy Staehler vs Emily Adams / Mara Orchard6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-07-26vs NJ GOLDWon 20
W#1 DoublesAllison Abrams / Megan Aliffi vs Brigid McClaire / Jo Johnson6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMandy Staehler / Crystal Burkhart vs Diane Hedberg / Holly McClure6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Molly Burke
published
3.48
Allison Abrams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Emma Tiernon
published 3.5
2.81
Mandy Staehler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.68
Lisa Hoogendoorn Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Gina Cozza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Abrams + Molly Burke18066% games+5.2% vs expected
Lisa Hoogendoorn Daniel + Mandy Staehler2442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Burke
29W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Allison Abrams
61W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%56%43%
3.48
3.5
Emma Tiernon
48W–26L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Mandy Staehler
30W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Lisa Hoogendoorn Daniel
26W–32L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Gina Cozza
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.