Teams

Farmington- Powell

2025 Charlottesville Singles · Charlottesville Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-16vs Meyer - All You Need is LobWon 10
W#2 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Courtney Wenleder6-0, 6-4
2025-10-09vs Grant - Keswick: Slice NinjasSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMeaghan Brody vs Emily Granville3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesKatie Cowen vs Celia Im6-3, 6-2
2025-10-06vs Hubbard - Sweet ShotsLost 02
L#2 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Elizabeth Beasley6-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesAnn Hay Hardy vs Blair Hubbard2-6, 3-6
2025-09-25Won 10
W#2 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Lauren Dunn6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-09-18vs Meyer - All You Need is LobLost 01
L#2 SinglesAnn Hay Hardy vs Susan Wunderlich1-6, 3-6
2025-09-11vs Grant - Keswick: Slice NinjasLost 01
L#2 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Emma Clancy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-08vs Hubbard - Sweet ShotsWon 10
W#2 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Elizabeth Beasley6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-28vs Johnson - Volley VixensLost 02
L#2 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Lindy Kastendike5-7
L#3 SinglesAnn Hay Hardy vs Lauren Dunn6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Kendall Southmayd
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.10
Katherine Jane Powell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.93
Loring Woodriff
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.77
Jill Lord
published
2.73
Ann Hay Hardy
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.72
Katie Cowen
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.48
Meaghan Brody
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Hay Hardy + Loring Woodriff8654% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendall Southmayd
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
Katherine Jane Powell
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3
Loring Woodriff
71W–61L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Jill Lord
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Ann Hay Hardy
64W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Katie Cowen
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Caroline Childers
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Meaghan Brody
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.