Teams

Wi 3.5 M Metro non-progressing

2024 WI Metro Fall · 3.5 Metro M non-progressing

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesPaul Lubinski / Cassidy McGarry vs Todd Tweet / James Morrell6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBrady Cassada vs Ryan Bowers2-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesRyan Bowers / James Morrell vs Brady Cassada / Cassidy McGarry7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPaul Lubinski vs Nate Schoenborn6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesBrady Cassada / Paul Lubinski vs James Morrell / Todd Tweet6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCassidy McGarry vs Ryan Bowers3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRyan Bowers / James Morrell vs Cassidy McGarry / Paul Lubinski3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrady Cassada vs Todd Tweet7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBrady Cassada / Cassidy McGarry vs Nate Schoenborn / Todd Tweet6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesPaul Lubinski vs Ryan Bowers3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesPaul Lubinski / Brady Cassada vs Ryan Bowers / Todd Tweet4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCassidy McGarry vs Nate Schoenborn6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Metro M non-progressing
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI 3.5 M Metro Bowers non-progressing0671124186
2Wi 3.5 M Metro non-progressing0651326174

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Cassidy McGarry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.78
Paul Lubinski
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Brady Cassada
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
James Morrell
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Lubinski + Cassidy McGarry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cassidy McGarry
11W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.94
Paul Lubinski
15W–17L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Brady Cassada
9W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
James Morrell
6W–3L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.