Teams

SGV LLW Titans-Schiffman-San Marino TC/TH12

2025 Adult Division - 40 & Over - Week Day League - San Gabr · SGV - 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesAnita Tang / Shannon Koeppen vs Helle Hegelund / Nadine Ono6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLeslie Levy / Milou Lee vs Ayuko Siegel / DENISE GICK7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMinnie Ingersoll vs Christine Russell6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnita Tang / Kelly Paulus vs Judith Hine / Teri McClure6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMilou Lee / Terry Meng vs Judith Hine / Ayuko Siegel5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMinnie Ingersoll / Kelly Paulus vs Gail Gerbode / Pamela Girard6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMindy Schiffman / Leslie Levy vs Helle Hegelund / DENISE GICK6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesKelly Paulus / Milou Lee vs Helle Hegelund / Christine Russell6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMinnie Ingersoll vs Sandy Mandel6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnita Tang / Terry Meng vs Judith Hine / Pamela Girard6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMindy Schiffman / Milou Lee vs Helle Hegelund / Teri McClure6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesMilou Lee / Leslie Levy vs Ayuko Siegel / DENISE GICK1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Minnie Ingersoll
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Milou Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Anita Tang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Kelly Paulus
published
3.38
Sean Ky
published
3.38
Shannon Koeppen
published
3.34
Becky Kim
published 3.5
3.26
Mindy Schiffman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Diane Quan
published 3.5
3.09
Terry Meng
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Tang + Minnie Ingersoll7258% games+2.0% vs expected
Sean Ky + Anita Tang9557% games−3.5% vs expected
Milou Lee + Anita Tang9357% gamesnot enough data
Mindy Schiffman + Milou Lee4162% gamesnot enough data
Milou Lee + Minnie Ingersoll404 matchesnot enough data
Sean Ky + Milou Lee303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Minnie Ingersoll
68W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
4.21
3.5
Milou Lee
55W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Anita Tang
70W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Kelly Paulus
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Sean Ky
27W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Shannon Koeppen
29W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
3.5
Becky Kim
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Mindy Schiffman
84W–100L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Diane Quan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Terry Meng
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.