Teams

Moore (Coral Pine)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Night · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-11-29vs Saborit (Ron Ehmann)Won 10
W#2 DoublesFernando Capote / Felipe de Los Rios vs Javier Rodriguez / Ryan Anania6-2, 6-3
2022-11-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesFelipe de Los Rios / Fernando Capote vs Ronald Vidaurre / Roberto Gonzalez6-4, 6-3
2022-11-01vs Guevara (Doral Park)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesFernando Capote / Felipe de Los Rios vs Alejandro Gonzalez / Omar Antonio Crespo Nieves6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-10-25vs Rodriguez (Alper JCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesFelipe de Los Rios / Fernando Capote vs Gerardo Perdigon / Manuel Lopez6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesFernando Capote / Felipe de Los Rios vs Michel Kulcsar / Arie Geller3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-16vs Valecillos (Continental)Won 10
W#1 DoublesFernando Capote / Felipe de Los Rios vs Daniel Ferguson-McAllister / ROGER VALECILLOS6-2, 6-2
2022-10-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesFernando Capote / Felipe de Los Rios vs Dimitri Bayard / Sean Bayard6-1, 6-1
2022-10-04vs Sengupta (Crandon Park)Won 10
W#2 DoublesFelipe de Los Rios / Neel Parikh vs Francisco Cruz / Kevin Jeanne dit Fouque6-2, 6-4
2022-09-13vs TennisAddicts (Tamiami Tennis)Won 10
W#2 DoublesFelipe de Los Rios / Fernando Capote vs Ricardo Alvarez / Jose A Viloria6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Neel Parikh
published
4.07
Fernando Capote
published
3.96
Felipe Marcilio
published
3.95
Leonard Chinchay
published
3.92
Thomas Kunz
published
3.81
3.76
Luis Zolezzi
published
3.66
Felipe de Los Rios
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.59
Douglas Inciarte
published
3.36
Manuel Mejia
published
Galo Arguello
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neel Parikh
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Fernando Capote
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.07
Felipe Marcilio
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.96
Leonard Chinchay
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
Thomas Kunz
33W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%27%
3.92
4
Costantino Pischedda
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Luis Zolezzi
28W–29L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Felipe de Los Rios
106W–61L career · 9 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
Douglas Inciarte
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.59
Manuel Mejia
10W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
Galo Arguello
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.