Teams

JTC - Schafer

2022 Alachua Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-18vs WS - FergusonWon 20
W#1 DoublesChrista Arnold / Ed Stark vs TARA BROMIRSKI / Thomas Duffaut7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChad Schafer / Jigisha Shah vs Nathan Whitaker / Irina Madorsky1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-17vs JTC - LancasterWon 10
W#1 DoublesEd Stark / Kannika Torres vs Jack Jacobs / Tiffany Schmidt6-1, 6-0
2022-03-06vs WS - Lai/LingWon 10
W#1 DoublesChrista Arnold / Ed Stark vs Marlene Townsend / Xiaoping Zhang6-3, 6-4
2022-03-02vs JTC - LancasterWon 10
W#1 DoublesJigisha Shah / Ed Stark vs Erik Schmidt / Tiffany Schmidt6-3, 6-0
2022-02-11vs JTC - ZaldivarSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChrista Arnold / Ed Stark vs Amber Muehlmann / Kevin Smith5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKannika Torres / Chad Schafer vs Laurie McLaughlin / Steve Upshaw3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-01-30vs DB - BlairWon 10
W#1 DoublesEd Stark / Christa Arnold vs Hebah Fox / Newell Fox6-2, 6-4
2022-01-23vs Alachua - WS/PaulySplit 11
L#1 DoublesKannika Torres / Chad Schafer vs Elizabeth Dickerson / Enrique Vargas4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChrista Arnold / Ed Stark vs Natalie Ebner / Rick Melzer6-2, 7-6
2022-01-14vs WS - Lai/LingWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Diblin / Jennine Brandt vs Johnny Ho / Ching Zhou4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Kim Magee
published
3.45
Chad Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Ed Stark
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.35
Kannika Torres
published
3.34
Christa Arnold
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.21
Mark Diblin
published
3.08
Jigisha Shah
published
Jennine Brandt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Rowe
published
Susie Finfrock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christa Arnold + Ed Stark491960% games+3.7% vs expected
Christa Arnold + Chad Schafer2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Magee
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Chad Schafer
109W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Ed Stark
288W–120L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kannika Torres
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Christa Arnold
271W–143L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
Mark Diblin
10W–15L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Jigisha Shah
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jennine Brandt
77W–116L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Scott Rowe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susie Finfrock
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.