Teams

8.0 Qualifying Team

2026 65 & Over League · Women 8.0 - 65 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Women 8.0 - 65 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
18.0 Qualifying Team000000
2Game, Set, Laughs000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Sandy Stursma
published
3.44
3.38
Anne Caprio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Marsha Taylor
published
3.27
Cheryl Scott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Glenna Hageman
published 3.5
3.24
DIANA RAIMONDO
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Karen Vinton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Shull
published
Miho Lloyd
published
Patricia Torgerson
published
Willa Craig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Willa Craig + Elizabeth Brennan3548% gamesnot enough data
DIANA RAIMONDO + Anne Caprio033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy Stursma
22W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
4
Elizabeth Brennan
19W–18L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Anne Caprio
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Marsha Taylor
28W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Cheryl Scott
16W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Glenna Hageman
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
DIANA RAIMONDO
43W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Karen Vinton
11W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Shull
4W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Miho Lloyd
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Torgerson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Willa Craig
29W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.