Teams

Bailey/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-02vs HemaniCarswell/KnoxvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesJenny McGlothin / Lake Bailey vs Adriana Shimeall / Darcy Hoffman6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesShannon Swafford vs Melissa Kirby6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlyssa Weagley / Callie Jubran vs Michelle Russ / Haley Seivers6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesEmily Bynum vs Leigh Gatto6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGina Hovis / Leslie Lischer vs Lisha Venable / Monica Sarrat6-0, 6-0
2025-04-25vs Niethammer/Buckner/ChesneyLost 23
W#1 DoublesJenny Hall / Alyssa Weagley vs Madison Coleman / Heather Ridenour6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJenny McGlothin vs Meredith Buckner3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMeka Barry / Maggie Reynolds vs Younsun Choi / Jessie Hall1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesStephanie Wetherington vs Ashtyn Wright4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Bynum / Gina Hovis vs Amanda Niethammer / Mimi Rust4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-11vs GomesStallings/KnoxvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesGina Hovis / Jenny McGlothin vs Alyssa Sprouse / Pearl Jhala2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShannon Swafford vs Sarah Michalik4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMaggie Reynolds / Lake Bailey vs Katherine Michalik / Karli Campbell6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMeka Barry vs Carolina Lyngh4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlyssa Weagley / Jenny Hall vs Jen Stallings / Laura Brumit6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-28vs HemaniCarswell/KnoxvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesJenny Hall / Jenny McGlothin vs Suzanne Carswell / Monica Sarrat7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLake Bailey vs Leigh Gatto6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeka Barry / Gina Hovis vs Lisha Venable / Haley Seivers6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesShannon Swafford vs Shireen Hemani6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCallie Jubran / Brittany Dilworth vs Kimberly LeRoy / Caroline Ervin6-0, 7-6
2025-03-26vs Niethammer/Buckner/ChesneyLost 23
L#1 DoublesLake Bailey / Gina Hovis vs Amanda Niethammer / Ashtyn Wright6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesShannon Swafford vs Meredith Buckner6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Bowman / Maggie Reynolds vs Heather Ridenour / Jessie Hall6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMeka Barry vs Mandi McCrary6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHayley Lyons / Elsa Messer vs Faith Chesney / Younsun Choi1-6, 3-6
2025-03-07vs GomesStallings/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Weagley / Jenny Hall vs Pearl Jhala / Alyssa Sprouse2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesJenny McGlothin vs Karli Campbell6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Bailey Oakes / Meka Barry vs Katherine Michalik / Carolina Lyngh1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLake Bailey vs Sarah Scott6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLauren Bowman / Pomy Lewis vs Jen Stallings / Lea Parks2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Lake Bailey
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.09
Gina Hovis
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.98
Shannon Swafford
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.92
Alyssa Weagley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Jenny McGlothin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.90
Leslie Lischer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Callie Jubran
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Stephanie Wetherington
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.67
Meka Barry
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.67
Mary Bailey Oakes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Lauren Bowman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Pomy Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Brittany Dilworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Emily Bynum
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Elsa Messer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hayley Lyons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Hovis + Leslie Lischer5941% games+1.5% vs expected
Gina Hovis + Lake Bailey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lake Bailey
45W–20L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
Gina Hovis
24W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Shannon Swafford
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Alyssa Weagley
24W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jenny McGlothin
12W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
Leslie Lischer
22W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Callie Jubran
16W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Stephanie Wetherington
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Meka Barry
15W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Mary Bailey Oakes
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Lauren Bowman
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Pomy Lewis
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
2.5
Brittany Dilworth
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Emily Bynum
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.28
Elsa Messer
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Hayley Lyons
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.