Teams

Nave - Tri-Force

2025 Hampton Roads Tri-Level · Hampton Roads Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-18vs Deleon - SUPREMELost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Pierce / Cheng Tung vs Todd Detweiler / Andre Rogers4-6, 6-7
2025-09-04vs Sabalburo - REIGNLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael-Angelo Orciga / Cheng Tung vs James Bracey / Chris Sabalburo1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRitesh Patel / Christopher Dimaya vs Steeve Ah Soune / Tyrone Wilson0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Griffith / Andrew Stukey vs Allen Acompanado / Riggs Deleon2-6, 1-6
2025-08-28vs Deleon - SUPREMELost 12
W#1 DoublesJustin Pierce / Cheng Tung vs Todd Detweiler / Dillon Bradshaw7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichael-Angelo Orciga / Ritesh Patel vs Noah Dobrinsky / Christopher Valdez6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJeff Griffith / Carl Apelizan vs Nate Williams / Rick Goodman2-6, 2-6
2025-08-17vs Sabalburo - REIGNLost 12
W#1 DoublesCheng Tung / Hank Brooks vs Chris Sabalburo / James Bracey7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristopher Dimaya / Ritesh Patel vs Tyrone Wilson / Matthew Dey0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Griffith / Ronald Nave vs Robert Ngo / Allen Acompanado2-6, 1-6
2025-08-07vs Deleon - SUPREMELost 12
W#1 DoublesJustin Pierce / Cheng Tung vs Dillon Bradshaw / Andre Rogers6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichael-Angelo Orciga / Christopher Dimaya vs Noah Dobrinsky / Patrick Lonning3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarl Apelizan / Ronald Nave vs Rick Goodman / Nate Williams2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Justin Pierce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Cheng Tung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Hank Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Christopher Dimaya
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Andrew Stukey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Carl Apelizan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jeff Griffith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael-Angelo Orciga
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ronald Nave
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Pierce + Cheng Tung213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Pierce
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
4.5
Cheng Tung
4W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.82
4
Hank Brooks
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Christopher Dimaya
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3
Andrew Stukey
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.11
2.5
Carl Apelizan
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.85
Jeff Griffith
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael-Angelo Orciga
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronald Nave
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.