Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Balch

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 6.0M

14 players · average NTRP 2.62 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-24vs Sports Mall-Osborn/MillerLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Riches / Benjamin Wilson vs Rick Scott / David Osborn1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShawn Turner / Alfred Balch vs Rod Zimbelman / Mark Miller4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Richie / Robert Janzen vs Ric Reed / Garth Neilsen0-6, 0-6
2024-06-17vs Sports Mall-Rozsa/BachmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlfred Balch / J David Nelson vs Dean Bachman / David Rozsa1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesClark Layton / Ryan Riches vs Jeff Henderson / Dan Murray3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTimothy Jeffryes / Mark Stonehocker vs Darren Nelson / Reed Reinhold4-6, 3-6
2024-06-03vs Sports Mall-Osborn/MillerLost 03
L#1 DoublesGlenn Bailey / Shawn Turner vs Tony Mokhtarian / Russ Whitehouse2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Janzen / Benjamin Wilson vs Brent Butcher / Kirk Watanuki1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTimothy Jeffryes / Larry Richie vs David Osborn / Ric Reed0-6, 1-6
2024-05-20vs Sports Mall-Rozsa/BachmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesHoward Davis / Shawn Turner vs Dean Bachman / Rick Killpack0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTimothy Jeffryes / Clark Layton vs Jerry Harward / David Rozsa3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAlfred Balch / J David Nelson vs JOSEPH BROWN / Dave Carlen6-4, 6-2
2024-05-04vs Sports Mall-Osborn/MillerLost 03
L#1 DoublesShawn Turner / Glenn Bailey vs Kirk Watanuki / Chen-Yuan Wu2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlfred Balch / Marco Pacheco vs David Osborn / Rick Scott2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Janzen / J David Nelson vs Garth Neilsen / Brent Butcher1-6, 1-6
2024-04-29vs Sports Mall-Rozsa/BachmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesClark Layton / Mark Stonehocker vs David Rozsa / Matthew Lewis1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHoward Davis / Robert Janzen vs Rick Killpack / Dean Bachman0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Wilson / Shawn Turner vs Dan Murray / Reed Reinhold4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clark Layton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Glenn Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.48
Alfred Balch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.47
Benjamin Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.40
Robert Janzen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
Mark Stonehocker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.34
Timothy Jeffryes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.10
Marco Pacheco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.07
Larry Richie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Harrison Lazarus
published
Howard Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
J David Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ryan Riches
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Shawn Turner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Stonehocker + Larry Richie3347% games+9.0% vs expected
Alfred Balch + Clark Layton01036% games+1.5% vs expected
Timothy Jeffryes + Glenn Bailey61640% games+0.6% vs expected
Timothy Jeffryes + Alfred Balch11630% games−3.7% vs expected
Alfred Balch + Benjamin Wilson1433% games−4.4% vs expected
Timothy Jeffryes + Benjamin Wilson1431% games−7.7% vs expected
Mark Stonehocker + Benjamin Wilson2538% games−8.8% vs expected
Glenn Bailey + Benjamin Wilson32037% games−9.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Clark Layton
13W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Glenn Bailey
46W–138L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Alfred Balch
51W–204L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%57%43%
2.48
3
Benjamin Wilson
20W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.47
Robert Janzen
4W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Mark Stonehocker
17W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Timothy Jeffryes
26W–102L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
Marco Pacheco
13W–57L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Larry Richie
39W–119L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Harrison Lazarus
1W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Howard Davis
42W–82L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
J David Nelson
3W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Riches
13W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shawn Turner
25W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.