Teams

CV-Rancho Las Palmas/Fuggetta & Potter

2025 CV Fall Combo Doubles · CV-Women 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.68 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-22vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/Young & QuinnLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessica DePalatis / Susan Sacks vs Celeste Armitage / Hilary Quinn1-3
W#2 DoublesJamie Bell / Rebecca Ringer vs Susan Parker / Heather Black7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNancy Closson / Marla Roberts vs Janice Campbell / Suzanne Young3-6, 3-6
2025-12-18vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/MorinSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSusan Potter / Susan Sacks vs Susan D Morin / Carrie Morton5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGrace Baraniak / Jessica DePalatis vs Gayle Friedman / Barbara Johns6-4, 6-4
2025-12-11vs CV-The Lakes/J Lyons & K WatsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarlie Stanley / Susan Sacks vs Sally Mangina / Janette Lyons7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-20vs CV-Palm Springs TC/K RogersLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Isen / Carrie Finger vs Maureen Jaramillo / MaryKay McCoy4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Peixotto-Monk / Susan Sacks vs Erica Sorrentino-Sutton / Susan Caruso7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJamie Bell / Grace Baraniak vs Julie Exley / Doris Hoffmann4-6, 2-6
2025-11-13vs CV-IWTG/Tammy PronenkoLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Isen / Marla Roberts vs Lorna Matthew / Sara Asatiani7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-06vs CV-Palm Desert TC/CannonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJamie Bell / Susan Sacks vs Sue Cannon / Jen Turner6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Isen / Marla Roberts vs Caroline Cavelti / Allyson Marks3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-30vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/Young & QuinnSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAngela Peixotto-Monk / Susan Sacks vs Katie Buechel / Hilary Quinn3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJessica DePalatis / Cheryl Isen vs Kathleen Rae / Paula Buononato6-1, 6-4
2025-10-23vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/MorinLost 01
L#1 DoublesJamie Bell / Grace Baraniak vs Susan Brooks / Susan D Morin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV-Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Angela Peixotto-Monk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Cheryl Isen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Jamie Bell
published 4
3.58
Joan Hall
published
3.55
Grace Baraniak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Kathy McCann
published 4
3.40
Susan Sacks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Rebecca Ringer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Marla Roberts
published
3.26
Debbie Fuggetta
published 3.5
Blossom Cohon
published 3.5
Carlie Stanley
published 3.5
Carrie Finger
published 3.5
Kathy Schwalbe
published
Martha Church
published
Nancy Closson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Nolan
published
Sanae Chance
published
Susan Potter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Peixotto-Monk + Kathy McCann2450% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Fuggetta + Marla Roberts123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Peixotto-Monk
43W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
4
Cheryl Isen
83W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Jamie Bell
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Joan Hall
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Grace Baraniak
61W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
4
Kathy McCann
104W–124L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Susan Sacks
116W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Rebecca Ringer
63W–53L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Marla Roberts
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Debbie Fuggetta
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Blossom Cohon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carlie Stanley
3W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carrie Finger
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Schwalbe
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Church
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Closson
157W–86L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Nolan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sanae Chance
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Potter
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.