Teams

GJTC DJOHNSON

2023 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - WS · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-17vs GJTC CSMITHWon 30
W#1 DoublesTaya McCallum / Dan Johnson vs James Heaps / Holly Smith6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTracy Keller / Cy Allen vs Craig Smith / Susan Erb6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeidi Scotting / Ryan Scotting vs Rodney Sharp / Susan Cassidy6-3, 6-1
2023-05-12vs GJTC JTHORNTONWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Thompson / Cy Allen vs Vicki Schoeber / Benjamin Blair6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHannah Bou-Matar / Dan Johnson vs Sharon Reiner / Steve Brown7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeidi Scotting / Ryan Scotting vs Ramona McKenzie / Whit Blair3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-03vs GJTC JWATSONWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmber Skillicorn / Karsten Bump vs Kathy Den / Richard Plett6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHannah Bou-Matar / David Fife vs Jennifer Watson / Christopher Cutsforth3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTaya McCallum / Dan Johnson vs Peggy Wrich / Curt Hansen6-4, 6-0
2023-04-27vs GJTC JWATSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarsten Bump / Amber Skillicorn vs Curt Hansen / Jennifer Watson6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTaya McCallum / Dan Johnson vs Kathy Den / Richard Plett0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHannah Bou-Matar / David Fife vs Rachael Kappius / Braden Kappius6-1, 6-0
2023-04-26vs GJTC CSMITHWon 21
L#1 DoublesDan Johnson / Hannah Bou-Matar vs Mathew Dokoupil / Heather Shuman6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKarsten Bump / Amber Skillicorn vs John Hanna / Susan Erb6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCy Allen / Tracy Keller vs Rodney Sharp / Amanda Grimsley6-1, 6-3
2023-04-19vs GJTC JTHORNTONWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeidi Scotting / Ryan Scotting vs Vicki Schoeber / Benjamin Blair6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmber Skillicorn / Karsten Bump vs Jeff Thornton / Tinarivo Ranivomboahangy6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHannah Bou-Matar / David Fife vs Ramona McKenzie / Whit Blair6-0, 6-1
2023-04-12vs GJTC JWATSONWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Fife / Hannah Bou-Matar vs Braden Kappius / Rachael Kappius6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTaya McCallum / Dan Johnson vs Curt Hansen / Peggy Wrich7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHeidi Scotting / Ryan Scotting vs Marilyn Hall / Richard Plett6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2023-04-07vs GJTC JTHORNTONWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Thompson / Cy Allen vs Tinarivo Ranivomboahangy / Jeff Thornton6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTaya McCallum / Dan Johnson vs Sharon Reiner / Steve Brown4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmber Skillicorn / Karsten Bump vs Ramona McKenzie / Whit Blair7-5, 6-4
2023-04-05vs GJTC CSMITHWon 21
W#1 DoublesHannah Bou-Matar / David Fife vs Craig Smith / Susan Cassidy6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Scotting / Ryan Scotting vs Susan Erb / John Hanna3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracy Keller / Cy Allen vs Heather Shuman / Mathew Dokoupil7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Taya McCallum
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.66
Heidi Scotting
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.60
Amber Skillicorn
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.54
David Fife
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Hannah Bou-Matar
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.34
Ryan Scotting
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Karsten Bump
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Cy Allen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Tracy Keller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah Bou-Matar + David Fife16073% games+13.4% vs expected
Heidi Scotting + Ryan Scotting201057% games+5.0% vs expected
Amber Skillicorn + Karsten Bump18162% games+3.8% vs expected
Hannah Bou-Matar + Cy Allen404 matchesnot enough data
Taya McCallum + Cy Allen314 matchesnot enough data
Taya McCallum + Ryan Scotting123 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Keller + Cy Allen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Taya McCallum
121W–65L career · 11 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Heidi Scotting
120W–79L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Amber Skillicorn
62W–24L career · 8 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
David Fife
101W–26L career · 5 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Hannah Bou-Matar
150W–55L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Ryan Scotting
71W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Karsten Bump
60W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Cy Allen
30W–12L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy Keller
20W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.