Teams

FOUNTAINGROVE-AC 55AW8.0A

2026 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

12 players · average NTRP / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-24vs LA CANTERA RC 55AW8.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Valerga / Natalie Cosentino Manning vs Elaine Madson / Kelly Thompson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGinger Kelly / Teri Giusti-Cobb vs Amanda Cornelius / Ulu McBride0-6, 0-6
2026-05-20vs NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesNatalie Cosentino Manning / Kim Valerga vs Jane Liddle / Amanda DeBord1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Krickl / Mary Schwank vs Susan Collins / Pam Myers0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesCarol Wood / Theresa Martinez vs Amy Atherton / Joanna Sienkiewicz6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNichelle Watkins / Natalie Cosentino Manning vs Leslie Grevin / Jeanne Gulner2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPatricia Krickl / Ginger Kelly vs Jean Elliott / Holly Woolard1-6, 1-6
2026-05-03vs PETALUMA TA/CASA GRANDE HS 55AW8.0ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesGeri Amaral / Theresa Martinez vs Melanie Beardslee / Jill Manning Sartori6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTiffany Dinardo / Natalie Cosentino Manning vs Jean Elliott / Kathy Halligan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTheresa Martinez / Carol Wood vs Melanie Beardslee / Amy Atherton6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNichelle Watkins / Kim Valerga vs Leslie Grevin / Valorie Cronin3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMary Schwank / Judith Mattingly vs Kathy Halligan / Joanna Sienkiewicz3-6, 2-6
2026-04-26vs LA CANTERA RC 55AW8.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesNatalie Cosentino Manning / Tiffany Dinardo vs Alicia Deguchi / Elaine Madson4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Schwank / Judith Mattingly vs Jennifer Averbuck / Kelly Thompson5-7, 2-6
2026-04-22vs LA CANTERA RC 55AW8.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesGeri Amaral / Theresa Martinez vs Ulu McBride / Elaine Madson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNichelle Watkins / Kim Valerga vs Jennifer Averbuck / Camie Schneider7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Schwank / Tiffany Dinardo vs Alicia Deguchi / Terri Somers2-6, 3-6
2026-04-16vs NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesTheresa Martinez / Kim Valerga vs Tracy Dennis / Dianne Maher7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Schwank / Carol Wood vs Jane Liddle / Donna Murphy0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTiffany Dinardo / Teri Giusti-Cobb vs Susan Collins / Pam Myers1-6, 2-6
2026-03-26vs NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesTheresa Martinez / Carol Wood vs Susan Collins / Jennifer Westly2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKim Valerga / Mary Schwank vs Jane Liddle / Virginia Freeland3-6, 3-6
2026-03-21vs LA CANTERA RC 55AW8.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesGeri Amaral / Natalie Cosentino Manning vs Amy Tompkins / Kelly Thompson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTiffany Dinardo / Teri Giusti-Cobb vs Rachel Blum / Alicia Deguchi1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings51 teams · Women 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 55AW8.0A9126412194
2NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AW8.0A9126415167
3WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW8.0B9124615198
4MOUNTAIN VIEW TC/RENGSTORFF PK 55AW8.0A9124617218
5BROADSTONE RC 55AW8.0A9125517222
6GOLD RIVER RC 55AW8.0B9124617218
7LOS GATOS SR 55AW8.0A9124617199
8SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 55AW8.0A9123718177
9MARIN TC 55AW8.0A9123719182
10BAY TREES PK 55AW8.0A8222821213
11ZEPHYR COVE 55AW8.0A8221922206
12SOUTH RENO TENNIS 55AW8.0A7321923239
13CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 55AW8.0A73201026228
14FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 55AW8.0A73191128245
15BAY CLUB PL 55AW8.0A73191130261
16WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW8.0A64201027224
17BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 55AW8.0A64191128230
18MORGAN HILL TC 55AW8.0A64171331260
19ROUND HILL CC 55AW8.0A64161431275
20GOLD RIVER RC 55AW8.0C64161432279
21HARBOR PT 55AW8.0A64161432261
22ORINDAWOODS 55AW8.0A64161432279
23SIERRA SPORT 55AW8.0A64141635257
24PETALUMA TA/CASA GRANDE HS 55AW8.0A64141636272
25SEASCAPE SC 55AW8.0A5214718175
26FIG GARDEN 55AW8.0A55161430263
27LA CANTERA RC 55AW8.0A55161431252
28SHARON HTS CC 55AW8.0A55141638284
29VALLEYVISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 55AW8.0A46141634278
30BERKELEY TC 55AW8.0A46131738287
31ROLLING HILLS 55AW8.0A46141639303
32SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 55AW8.0A46131741290
33RIO DEL ORO 55AW8.0A46131742306
34BELVEDERE TC 55AW8.0A46131743300
35GOLDMAN TC 55AW8.0A37131738294
36UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 55AW8.0A37121840284
37BAY TREES PK 55AW8.0B37111942307
38ARAGON HS 55AW8.0A37102043317
39HOPKINS PK 55AW8.0A37102044323
40PENINSULA TC 55AW8.0A3772350335
41CHAMISAL TC 55AW8.0A2571430216
42CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 55AW8.0A28102042290
43BROADSTONE RC 55AW8.0B2892143293
44TIBURON PEN C 55AW8.0A2892144302
45PLEASANTON 55AW8.0A2882247313
46CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 55AW8.0A1952553331
47FOUNTAINGROVE-AC 55AW8.0A01042653335
48BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 55AW8.0A01042655350
49CAUGHLIN 55AW8.0A01032756341
50GOLD RIVER RC 55AW8.0A01032757361
51DIAMOND HILLS 55AW8.0A01022858360

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Geri Amaral
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Theresa Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Kim Valerga
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Inga Cantu
published
3.56
Natalie Cosentino Manning
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
Mary Schwank
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Judith Mattingly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Nichelle Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Ginger Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Teri Giusti-Cobb
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Tiffany Dinardo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Patricia Krickl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inga Cantu + Kim Valerga314 matchesnot enough data
Kim Valerga + Natalie Cosentino Manning224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Valerga + Nichelle Watkins134 matchesnot enough data
Geri Amaral + Theresa Martinez213 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Kelly + Teri Giusti-Cobb123 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Cosentino Manning + Tiffany Dinardo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Geri Amaral
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
Theresa Martinez
10W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Kim Valerga
7W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Inga Cantu
7W–12L career · no lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.59
Natalie Cosentino Manning
3W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
Mary Schwank
1W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Judith Mattingly
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Nichelle Watkins
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.37
Ginger Kelly
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Teri Giusti-Cobb
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
Tiffany Dinardo
2W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Patricia Krickl
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.