Teams

BLACKHAWK CC 55MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-28vs NorCal/Chan/55&Over7.0MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Miller / Saurabh Shrivastava vs Sandra Harris / Zhonghua Zheng2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Saunders / Joseph Kardek vs Dongjie Fan / Dan Gullion3-6, 2-6
2025-10-16vs NorCal/Chan/55&Over7.0MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesGregory de la Pena / Julie Lassig vs Darien Lum / Melissa Bach3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Miller / Andy Lee vs Karina Ladion / Stanford Quan2-6, 1-6
2025-09-13vs NorCal/Chan/55&Over7.0MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Hsieh / Jill Fissel vs Don Scettrini / Michaela Katari3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Saunders / Francisco Marin vs Zhonghua Zheng / Marsha Heimbecker4-6, 0-6
2025-08-31vs NorCal/Chan/55&Over7.0MXLost 03
L#1 DoublesSaurabh Shrivastava / Julie Lassig vs Jennifer Do / Eric Zhong1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGregory de la Pena / Sara Hughes vs Michaela Katari / Shuangxi Xu3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Hsieh / Christine Miller vs Darien Lum / Karina Ladion5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Joseph Kardek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Rob Thomas
published
3.31
Saurabh Shrivastava
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
David Hsieh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Surinder Yadav
published 3.5
3.21
Jill Fissel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Gregory de la Pena
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Julie Lassig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Odette Kardek
published
2.94
Michelle Saunders
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Michelle Leiter
published
2.54
Andy Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Francisco Marin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Kardek
11W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Rob Thomas
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Saurabh Shrivastava
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
David Hsieh
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Surinder Yadav
26W–31L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Fissel
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Gregory de la Pena
3W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Julie Lassig
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Odette Kardek
14W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Michelle Saunders
14W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Michelle Leiter
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Andy Lee
6W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Francisco Marin
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.