Teams

Nemala/Nashville

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men Monday PM

8 players · average NTRP / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-28vs Malchow/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael McKeown / Mark Sargent vs Brandon Dixon / John Faldetta7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesVamsee Deep Nemala / VIVEK SAMUDRAM MUTHUVELU vs Chris Kelley / Michael Hughes0-6, 6-7
2025-07-07vs Yeager/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael McKeown / Mark Sargent vs Robert Grimes / Charles Yeager6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesVamsee Deep Nemala / VIVEK SAMUDRAM MUTHUVELU vs James Demouy / Preston Demouy1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJosh Packard / William Brown vs Brian Feyes / Chris Smeltzer3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-30vs Malchow/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael McKeown / Mark Sargent vs John Faldetta / Spartacus Crawford1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJosh Packard / VIVEK SAMUDRAM MUTHUVELU vs Jason Snap / Mark Hammond4-6, 0-6
2025-06-16vs Yeager/NashvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesJosh Packard / Jay Shin vs Daniel Hartono / Nicholas Yglesias1-6, 1-6
2025-05-26vs Yeager/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael McKeown / Mark Sargent vs Charles McCray / Preston Demouy4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVamsee Deep Nemala / VIVEK SAMUDRAM MUTHUVELU vs Jeff Khan / Charles Yeager1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMike Montali / William Brown vs Brian Feyes / Brad Dunn2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men Monday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Michael McKeown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Mark Sargent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Mike Montali
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Jay Shin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Garrett Ratliff
published
Josh Packard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
VIVEK SAMUDRAM MUTHUVELU
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vamsee Deep Nemala
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael McKeown + Mark Sargent2343% games+7.5% vs expected
VIVEK SAMUDRAM MUTHUVELU + Vamsee Deep Nemala033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael McKeown
15W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Mark Sargent
7W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.84
Mike Montali
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Jay Shin
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.03
Garrett Ratliff
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Josh Packard
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
VIVEK SAMUDRAM MUTHUVELU
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vamsee Deep Nemala
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.