Teams

LLW - Bakersfield Red Hots

2024 SCTA Doubles - Bakersfield · 3.0 Women's-Bake

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-15vs Bako - Tennis CollectiveWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerry Echeverria / Minda Owens vs Trellis Green / Sheryl Idica Ocampo6-1, 6-2
2024-11-24vs Bako - Volley GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmanda Buoni / Minda Owens vs Lynette Gamez / Brenda Kettler6-3, 6-4
2024-11-17vs Bako - Tennis CollectiveWon 20
W#1 DoublesSheridan Hadaway / Marri Tillema vs Jasmin Batiste / Thuy Nguyen6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMinda Owens / Megan Reed vs Chelsea Ashcraft / Kari Underwood6-1, 6-0
2024-10-27vs Bako - Tennis CollectiveWon 10
W#3 DoublesMinda Owens / SUZANNE TEVELDE vs Rhea Barrett / Bailey Forrest6-2, 6-1
2024-10-13vs Bako - Volley GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Huynh / Marri Tillema vs Tracey Barnes / Brenda Kettler6-0, 6-3
2024-09-29vs Bako - Tennis CollectiveWon 10
W#3 DoublesMinda Owens / Ally Triolo vs Veronica Palacios Vargas / Chelsea Ashcraft6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women's-Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Sheridan Hadaway
published
3.38
Erin Black
published 4
3.30
Lauren Huynh
published
3.21
Erika Gatson
published 3.5
2.98
Miranda Hwang
published
2.92
SUZANNE TEVELDE
published
2.92
Megan Reed
published
2.90
Marri Tillema
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Minda Owens
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.68
Maile Frelinger
published
2.62
Amanda Buoni
published 3
Terry Echeverria
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marri Tillema + Minda Owens101253% games+7.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheridan Hadaway
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Erin Black
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.38
Lauren Huynh
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Erika Gatson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
Miranda Hwang
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
SUZANNE TEVELDE
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
Megan Reed
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Marri Tillema
49W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Minda Owens
39W–55L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
2.78
Maile Frelinger
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Amanda Buoni
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
Terry Echeverria
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.