Teams

STEELE/HCP/FOOTHILLS

2022 Foothills Tri-Level - 18 & over · Women's Group C 3.5-4.0-4.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-08-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShanda Hedrick / Rhonda Davis vs Katie Teague / Virginia Bost2-6, 1-6
2022-06-29vs Owens/YMCA/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesTammy Dennis / Shanda Hedrick vs Angela Beard / Tiffany Rash2-6, 2-6
2022-06-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelley Hurley / Shanda Hedrick vs Angela Beard / Katie Teague2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group C 3.5-4.0-4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Kerri Oakley
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Tammy Dennis
published
3.75
Kristina Abee
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Shanda Hedrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Lynne Place
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.38
Rhonda Davis
published
3.27
Marsha Diamonti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Catherine Lundberg
published 3.5
Kelley Hurley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynne Place + Kerri Oakley8754% games+5.7% vs expected
Tammy Dennis + Kerri Oakley6170% games+5.3% vs expected
Tammy Dennis + Lynne Place123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kerri Oakley
105W–76L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Tammy Dennis
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Kristina Abee
40W–40L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Shanda Hedrick
29W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Lynne Place
149W–164L career · 10 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
Rhonda Davis
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
3.38
3.5
Marsha Diamonti
247W–258L career · 12 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Catherine Lundberg
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
Kelley Hurley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.