Teams

Sh.Chapman55A

2025 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-30vs Be.Robertson55AWon 21
L#1 DoublesLee Berrios-Smothers / Amy Ellis vs Susan Wilkerson / Christy Sandy4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Kucyk / Michelle Mills vs Diana Kennedy / Catherine Chavez4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRita Burgess / Michele Storr vs Jodi Haire / Michele Moore6-2, 6-3
2025-04-28vs El.Zimmerman55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichele Storr / Rita Burgess vs Dana Earle / Jennifer McFarling6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmber Bruner / Shirley Chapman vs Sarah Winstead / Stephanie Gillespie6-0, 6-4
2025-04-17vs Ki.Lamb55A3.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesApril Lyon / Debra Vaughn vs Corinne Alavi / Tina Goertz6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Elliott / Christa Hochstrasser vs Kimberly Lamb / Christy van Ness6-0, 6-3
2025-03-27vs Su.Ruggles55AWon 30
W#1 DoublesApril Lyon / Debra Vaughn vs Suzanne Ruggles / Laurene Fitzgerald0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSharon Kucyk / Michelle Mills vs Dawn Johnstone / Jorgelina Stroud6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCaroline Miller / Shirley Chapman vs Tina Parker / Susan Starnes7-5, 6-1
2025-03-26vs La.Edgerton55AWon 20
W#1 DoublesRita Burgess / Michele Storr vs Katherine Seawell-Lewis / Mari Jameel6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesApril Lyon / Lee Berrios-Smothers vs Laura Edgerton / Sherry Elder6-2, 6-2
2025-03-13vs He.Mills55AWon 20
W#2 DoublesRita Burgess / Michele Storr vs Melanie Waldron / Elisabeth Nixon6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAmy Ellis / Shirley Chapman vs Diane Sugarman / Maureen Doherty6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-06vs Ja.Murphy55ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlisa Miller / Christa Hochstrasser vs Louise Hutchinson / Dane Brackett4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Kucyk / Michelle Mills vs Palma DeSorbo / Michele Lee6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Michelle Mills
published
2.97
Michele Storr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Lee Berrios-Smothers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Amy Ellis
published 3
2.87
Rita Burgess
published
2.85
Carolyn Elliott
published 3
2.80
Sharon Kucyk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Amber Bruner
published 3
2.75
Shirley Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
April Lyon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.68
Perry LeGaux
published
2.63
Debra Vaughn
published 3
2.56
Christa Hochstrasser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Berrios-Smothers + April Lyon1545% gamesnot enough data
Amy Ellis + Lee Berrios-Smothers404 matchesnot enough data
Michele Storr + Rita Burgess314 matchesnot enough data
Shirley Chapman + Lee Berrios-Smothers123 matchesnot enough data
Shirley Chapman + Christa Hochstrasser123 matchesnot enough data
Shirley Chapman + Carolyn Elliott213 matchesnot enough data
Lee Berrios-Smothers + Christa Hochstrasser123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Mills
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Michele Storr
90W–76L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Lee Berrios-Smothers
78W–107L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Amy Ellis
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Rita Burgess
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Carolyn Elliott
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Sharon Kucyk
110W–118L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Amber Bruner
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Shirley Chapman
137W–74L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
3
April Lyon
118W–138L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Perry LeGaux
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Debra Vaughn
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Christa Hochstrasser
68W–118L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.