Teams

Sigmon/YMCA/Foothills

2022 Foothills Spring 40 & Over League · Men 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-28vs Swisher/LHCC/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGeorge Bolter / Aaron Steen vs Everett Wohlbruck / Mark Huegerich6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMark Eckard / Douglas Lee Honeycutt Jr vs Chad East / Jeremy East3-6, 0-6
2022-04-28vs Artus/DV/FoothillsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJody Eckard / Mark Eckard vs Philip Artus / Jason Osborne3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAaron Steen / George Bolter vs Brett Summey / David Sprague6-2, 6-2
2022-04-14vs Smith/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAaron Steen / George Bolter vs William Smith / Tim Boone6-4, 7-6
2022-04-07vs Artus/DV/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAaron Steen / Michael Duch vs Philip Artus / Jason Osborne5-7, 2-6
2022-03-31vs Swisher/LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAaron Steen / George Bolter vs Aaron Swisher / Dustin Deal6-7, 6-7
2022-03-17vs Artus/DV/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAaron Steen / Timothy Gansrow vs Philip Artus / Jason Osborne6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Henson / Mark Eckard vs Mark Templeton / Jason Triplett1-6, 0-6
2022-03-10vs Swisher/LHCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAaron Steen / Jody Eckard vs Aaron Swisher / Dustin Deal4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMark Eckard / Duane Mozingo vs Chad East / Mark Huegerich2-6, 3-6
2022-03-03vs Smith/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAaron Steen / Timothy Gansrow vs Brent Davis / Johnny Slagle6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Aaron Steen
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.81
George Bolter
published 4
3.72
Fernando Desousa
published 4
3.52
3.31
Mark Eckard
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.19
Robert Womack
published
3.10
Duane Mozingo
published 3.5
William Lewis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Bolter + Aaron Steen9162% games+2.8% vs expected
Mark Eckard + Aaron Steen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aaron Steen
133W–62L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
George Bolter
9W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Fernando Desousa
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Douglas Lee Honeycutt Jr
22W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Mark Eckard
49W–71L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Robert Womack
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Duane Mozingo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
William Lewis
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.