Teams

Jacques

2024 Frederick Mixed 18 & Over · Frederick Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.69 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-03-07vs Harv and the Harv NotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJodi Hathaway / Joseph Martin vs Traci Bidinger / Jaipaul Agonus6-1, 6-1
2024-03-04Won 20
W#1 DoublesBradley Jacques / Hannah Arnold Smith vs Kelly Turner / James Smith2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJodi Hathaway / Joseph Martin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-03vs ThongphokSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJodi Hathaway / Sithisak Sutsakhan vs Leslie Mansfield / Daniel Mansfield6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKate Ansalvish / Hans Elmlund vs Sandy Thongphok / Wayne Wang6-3, 6-0
2024-02-26vs Harv and the Harv NotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDon Barry / Kate Ansalvish vs Jaipaul Agonus / Laura Haney6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAshley Pietryka / Dustin Wolf vs Eric Parker / Karen Seyler6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJodi Hathaway / Joseph Martin vs Jim Jackson / Nancy Trimble4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-02-25vs ThongphokLost 02
L#1 DoublesHans Elmlund / Kate Ansalvish vs Ira Daar / Sarah Baker4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBradley Jacques / Maureen DeGrange vs Wayne Wang / Sabina Spicher3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-02-19vs Harv and the Harv NotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesHannah Arnold Smith / Glen Medina vs Jaipaul Agonus / Laura Haney6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDon Barry / Kate Ansalvish vs Nancy Trimble / Jim Jackson6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBradley Jacques / Maureen DeGrange vs Karen Seyler / Eric Parker1-6, 2-6
2024-02-07vs ThongphokLost 01
L#2 DoublesJodi Hathaway / Joseph Martin vs James Smith / Carrie Derse6-7, 2-6
2024-02-04vs Harv and the Harv NotsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHans Elmlund / Kate Ansalvish vs Ivan Kozliak / Traci Bidinger1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSithisak Sutsakhan / Melissa Galloway vs Karen Seyler / James Schiller6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-01-27vs ThongphokLost 01
L#1 DoublesHans Elmlund / Kate Ansalvish vs Roxanna Nemec / Wayne Wang6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-01-25vs Harv and the Harv NotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKate Ansalvish / Don Barry vs Traci Bidinger / Ivan Kozliak6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGiselle Medina / Sithisak Sutsakhan vs Jim Jackson / Nancy Trimble5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-01-18vs ThongphokLost 02
L#2 DoublesPasimani Fryauff / Sithisak Sutsakhan vs Joanna Woessner / Daniel Mansfield3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMaureen DeGrange / Glen Medina vs Sandy Thongphok / Derek Johnson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-01-07vs Harv and the Harv NotsWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshley Pietryka / Dustin Wolf vs Karen Seyler / Jim Jackson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHans Elmlund / Kate Ansalvish vs James Schiller / Traci Bidinger7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSithisak Sutsakhan / Giselle Medina vs Eric Parker / Laura Haney6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Ashley Pietryka
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
3.84
Jodi Hathaway
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Lacey Gordon
published
3.57
Bradley Jacques
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.49
Kate Ansalvish
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.44
Glen Medina
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.38
Pasimani Fryauff
published
3.35
Hans Elmlund
published
3.17
Sithisak Sutsakhan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.06
Giselle Medina
published
3.04
Carol Darling
published 3
2.85
Hannah Arnold Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Don Barry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sithisak Sutsakhan + Jodi Hathaway2447% gamesnot enough data
Bradley Jacques + Jodi Hathaway1441% gamesnot enough data
Giselle Medina + Glen Medina213 matchesnot enough data
Bradley Jacques + Lacey Gordon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Pietryka
129W–59L career · 11 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Jodi Hathaway
187W–146L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Lacey Gordon
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Bradley Jacques
192W–206L career · 7 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Kate Ansalvish
75W–52L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
4
Glen Medina
83W–132L career · 7 lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
3.44
Pasimani Fryauff
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Hans Elmlund
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Sithisak Sutsakhan
103W–109L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Giselle Medina
28W–27L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Carol Darling
45W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Hannah Arnold Smith
47W–42L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.85
Don Barry
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.