Teams

LTFCS DANIEL

2021 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - SOCO · MIXED 8.5 - ITA - SOCO

13 players · average NTRP 4.39 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesJames Stephen / Lori Kiser vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-08vs BRDMR PARKERSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJames Stephen / Lori Kiser vs David Schott / Nancy Siegel7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJae Kim / Judy Flaherty vs Rick Parker / Anne Estares6-2, 6-2
2021-08-01vs MEMPK NIEMANNLost 01
L#2 DoublesSean Daniel / Lori Kiser vs Reilly Fredell / Jennifer Mutka6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2021-07-18vs BRDMR PARKERWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlex Rosario / Lori Kiser vs Pat Pottger / Nancy Siegel6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDenton Desquitado / Judy Flaherty vs Jason McCullough / Rebecca Martin6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2021-07-17vs MEMPK NIEMANNWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Kiser / Alex Rosario vs Shinobu Voss / Joshua Voss6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Lori Kiser
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.43
Sean Daniel
published
4.38
Denton Desquitado
published 4.5
4.34
Lyubomir Lyubenov
published
4.21
Judy Flaherty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Reagan Simons
published 4.5
4.18
Alexia Hignett
published 4.5
3.93
Allyson McCale
published 4
Alex Rosario
published 4
Chantel Rosario
published 4
3.73
Jae Kim
published 4.5
Jason Egger
published
Karen Jensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Kiser + Sean Daniel404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Lori Kiser
45W–34L career · 5 lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
4.48
Sean Daniel
63W–25L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Denton Desquitado
26W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%17%
4.38
Lyubomir Lyubenov
25W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Judy Flaherty
79W–68L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Reagan Simons
20W–20L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Alexia Hignett
8W–4L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Allyson McCale
15W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Alex Rosario
31W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Chantel Rosario
19W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Jae Kim
20W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
3.73
Jason Egger
19W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Jensen
26W–34L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.