Teams

Bagwell/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-23vs Gustin/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesRenee Bagwell / Martha Filipkowski vs Emma Poindexter / Annette Thompson2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCheri Arnsdorff vs Jackie Hone7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTracy Polite / Allison Oaks vs Angela Gustin / Savannah Johnson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-11-16vs Tipton-Mendoza/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesCheri Arnsdorff / Emily Stiner vs Tracy Serrano / Katharine Brosnan2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHannah Frame vs Hilary Brooks3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoy Bray / Ashley Webb vs Ashley Tipton / Loreto Weaver6-3, 7-6
2024-10-26vs Waide/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesHannah Frame / Martha Filipkowski vs Meg Stratton / Kim Huinker6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesEmily Stiner vs LeAnn Waide1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoy Bray / Ashley Webb vs Jamie Iverson / Elizabeth Waide2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-20vs Gustin/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartha Filipkowski / Hannah Frame vs Jackie Hone / Savannah Johnson6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesCheri Arnsdorff vs Emilie Harris5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoy Bray / Ashley Webb vs Misty Gouge / Angela Gustin7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Hannah Frame
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.45
Tracy Polite
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Renee Bagwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Cheri Arnsdorff
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.34
Martha Filipkowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Allison Oaks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ashley Webb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Emily Stiner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Joy Bray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Bagwell + Tracy Polite314 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Webb + Joy Bray213 matchesnot enough data
Renee Bagwell + Hannah Frame303 matchesnot enough data
Renee Bagwell + Martha Filipkowski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Frame
13W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Tracy Polite
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45
Renee Bagwell
15W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Cheri Arnsdorff
31W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
Martha Filipkowski
14W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Allison Oaks
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Ashley Webb
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Emily Stiner
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joy Bray
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.