Teams

Epworth/James Bell

2026 GIT Men's Flex 2.5 3.0 3.5: Spring 2026 · Men's Flex 2.5 3.0 3.5 Mondays 5:30 p.m.

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-22vs Epworth/Steven AndrewsLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatrick Anderson / Adam Becker vs Richard Ballesteros / David Lipham6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRolf Haardoerfer vs Doug Denhof2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Dugan / Keith Pounds vs Nick Luppino / Steven Andrews2-6, 6-7
2026-06-08vs Epworth/Steven AndrewsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAdam Becker / Patrick Anderson vs Peter Boven / Nick Luppino6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRICHARD SAWYER / Rolf Haardoerfer vs Barry Dyer / David Anderson3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJames Bell / Robert Dugan vs Michael Furick / Doug Denhof6-4, 6-1
2026-06-01vs Epworth/Steven AndrewsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKeith Pounds / RICHARD SAWYER vs Mark Vaizer / Nick Luppino7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAdam Becker / Patrick Anderson vs Richard Ballesteros / Peter Boven6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Dugan / Rolf Haardoerfer vs David Anderson / David Lipham3-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesJoe Bisesi / James Bell vs Steven Andrews / Doug Denhof1-6, 1-6
2026-05-18vs Epworth/Steven AndrewsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPatrick Anderson / RICHARD SAWYER vs Peter Boven / Nick Luppino6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRobert Dugan vs Steven Andrews6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAdam Becker / Tyler Cole vs Richard Ballesteros / David Anderson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Bisesi / Rolf Haardoerfer vs Michael Furick / David Lipham3-6, 5-7
2026-05-11vs Epworth/Steven AndrewsWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatrick Anderson / Robert Dugan vs Peter Boven / Mark Vaizer2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Becker / Rolf Haardoerfer vs Barry Dyer / Richard Ballesteros3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRICHARD SAWYER / Joe Bisesi vs Doug Denhof / Michael Furick6-2, 6-2
2026-05-04vs Epworth/Steven AndrewsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPatrick Anderson / Adam Becker vs Mark Vaizer / Nick Luppino6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKeith Pounds / RICHARD SAWYER vs Peter Boven / Richard Ballesteros6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJames Bell / Robert Dugan vs Barry Dyer / Steven Andrews1-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesRolf Haardoerfer / Joe Bisesi vs Doug Denhof / Michael Furick5-7, 2-6
2026-04-27vs Epworth/Steven AndrewsWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatrick Anderson / Adam Becker vs Nick Luppino / Richard Ballesteros6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRICHARD SAWYER / Robert Dugan vs Mark Vaizer / Steven Andrews2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Bell / Rolf Haardoerfer vs David Anderson / David Lipham1-6, 2-6
2026-04-20vs Epworth/Steven AndrewsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAdam Becker / RICHARD SAWYER vs Mark Vaizer / Steven Andrews3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Dugan / Joe Bisesi vs Nick Luppino / David Anderson2-6, 1-6
2026-04-13vs Epworth/Steven AndrewsWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatrick Anderson / Keith Pounds vs Nick Luppino / Mark Vaizer6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJim Bullard / Adam Becker vs Richard Ballesteros / David Lipham6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoe Bisesi / Robert Dugan vs Barry Dyer / Michael Furick6-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men's Flex 2.5 3.0 3.5 Mondays 5:30 p.m.
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Epworth/Steven Andrews54172857428
2Epworth/James Bell45153063447

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Adam Becker
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.12
Patrick Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
2.99
Keith Pounds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Jim Bullard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Robert Dugan
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.10
Tyler Cole
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.09
Joe Bisesi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
1.94
Rolf Haardoerfer
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Anderson + Jim Bullard4156% games+16.6% vs expected
Adam Becker + Patrick Anderson5077% games+5.6% vs expected
Joe Bisesi + Rolf Haardoerfer0530% gamesnot enough data
Robert Dugan + Joe Bisesi134 matchesnot enough data
Robert Dugan + Tyler Cole123 matchesnot enough data
Jim Bullard + Tyler Cole033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adam Becker
12W–6L career · type S · 9 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Patrick Anderson
46W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.12
Keith Pounds
11W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.99
Jim Bullard
17W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Robert Dugan
19W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Tyler Cole
12W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Joe Bisesi
3W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Rolf Haardoerfer
4W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.