Teams

Cheung

2021 St. Mary's Mixed 18 & Over · St. Mary's Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-06vs Fahrner/EgeliWon 10
W#3 DoublesByron Dickerson / Sonia Roy vs Trey Bergen / Heather Muldoon6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2021-05-16vs Fahrner/EgeliWon 10
W#2 DoublesByron Dickerson / Rachel Lytle vs Casey MCFANN / Trey Bergen6-4, 6-2
2021-04-11vs GladwellWon 10
W#3 DoublesByron Dickerson / Rachel Lytle vs Kevin Findley / Jena Carrington6-2, 2-2
2021-03-14vs GladwellWon 10
W#2 DoublesByron Dickerson / Sonia Roy vs Andrew Hayes / Sabra Szczyglowski6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for St. Mary's Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Byron Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.57
Joseph Taylor
published
3.40
Nhi Phung
published 3.5
3.27
Adrian Stanton
published 3.5
3.26
James Borell
published 3.5
Don Behrens
published
Karolyn Clarke
published
Rachel Lytle
published
Sonia Roy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Taylor + Rachel Lytle033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Byron Dickerson
46W–31L career · type S · 10 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Joseph Taylor
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Nhi Phung
88W–65L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Adrian Stanton
3W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
James Borell
2W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Don Behrens
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karolyn Clarke
8W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rachel Lytle
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sonia Roy
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.