Teams

Roussel/40's/3.5/PAC Night

2026 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Night

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings2 teams · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Englert/40's/3.5/SC Night52171125233
2Roussel/40's/3.5/PAC Night25111739270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Amber Mata
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.22
Erin Lorio
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.20
Dana Gegenheimer
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.06
Danielle Roussel
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.04
Ana Perdigao
usually #1 Singles 31%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3
2.80
Elizabeth Guidotti
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 3
Jeanne Woodrick
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Laura Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Melissa Love
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mica Rolling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Peggy Benit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Sandoz
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Sonia Maltais
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Stephanie Songy
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Sandoz + Jeanne Woodrick3254% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Songy + Peggy Benit213 matchesnot enough data
Erin Lorio + Amber Mata123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amber Mata
22W–29L career · 28 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Erin Lorio
28W–19L career · 19 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Dana Gegenheimer
7W–20L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Danielle Roussel
16W–11L career · 16 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
3.06
3
Ana Perdigao
13W–13L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Elizabeth Guidotti
9W–22L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Jeanne Woodrick
12W–24L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Lucas
14W–10L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Love
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mica Rolling
17W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peggy Benit
8W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Sandoz
37W–21L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sonia Maltais
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Songy
20W–25L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.