Teams

Golden/LR/LRAC

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-26vs Lair/Shepard/LR/RebWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Ramsay / Roger Weldon vs Stephen Fussell / Charles Aitkens7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDOUG GOLDEN / Stephen Guffey vs Jeremy Partin / Rick Dickey6-2, 6-6
W#3 DoublesTheo Hronas / Harold Specht vs Bobby Perry / Eric Baker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-09vs Lair/Shepard/LR/RebLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Ramsay / David Newton vs Jeremy Partin / Rick Dickey6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephen Guffey / Peter Newey vs Charles Aitkens / Stephen Fussell3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesFrancis Hartz / Stephen Leake vs Jeff Hankins / Kirk Grynwald4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
DOUG GOLDEN
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.50
Roger Weldon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
John Ramsay
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.41
Harold Specht
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Derek Nordentoft
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Peter Newey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Stephen Leake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Francis Hartz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Theo Hronas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Jeff Maher
published
Stephen Guffey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Ramsay + Roger Weldon7260% games+5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
DOUG GOLDEN
24W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Roger Weldon
27W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
John Ramsay
20W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Harold Specht
17W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Derek Nordentoft
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Peter Newey
7W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Stephen Leake
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Francis Hartz
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Theo Hronas
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Jeff Maher
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Stephen Guffey
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.