Teams

Sons of Forest Hills

2023 Montgomery Adult 65 & Over Summer · Montgomery Adult 65 & over 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesArthur Luby / Frederick Duque vs David Pullen / David Kochanski6-0, 6-0
2023-08-21vs The Middle 65Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRichard McKeon / Peter Davis vs Jeffrey Dillman / Peter Bonaccorsi3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMalcolm Frazier / Frederick Duque vs John Simson / David Kochanski3-6, 4-6
2023-08-03vs The Middle 65Split 11
W#2 DoublesBrian Sadur / Bassem Melhem vs Terry Austin / Robert Vinson6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesArthur Luby / Frederick Duque vs David Pullen / John Simson3-6, 3-6
2023-07-23vs The Middle 65Split 11
W#2 DoublesBrian Sadur / Konrad Huppi vs Terry Austin / Robert Vinson7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPeter Baum / Richard McKeon vs Steven Wade / David Pullen3-6, 4-6
2023-07-17vs The Middle 65Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRichard McKeon / ROBERT RENNHACK vs Jeffrey Dillman / Peter Bonaccorsi2-6, 2-6
2023-07-08vs The Middle 65Won 10
W#3 DoublesPeter Davis / Richard McKeon vs Stanley Freeman / John Francis7-5, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 65 & over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bassem Melhem
published 3.5
3.11
Frederick Duque
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Konrad Huppi
published
2.86
Juan Rivas
published
2.85
Brian Sadur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Richard McKeon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.35
Malcolm Frazier
published
William Halfpap
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Rivas + Richard McKeon2443% games−8.0% vs expected
Brian Sadur + Richard McKeon5451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bassem Melhem
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Frederick Duque
52W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.11
Konrad Huppi
13W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Juan Rivas
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Brian Sadur
72W–85L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Ivan Teelucksingh
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Richard McKeon
235W–409L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Malcolm Frazier
2W–16L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.35
William Halfpap
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.