Teams

Biagioni/LR/Chenal

2024 Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Men - LOCAL LEAGUE AT STATE

9 players · average NTRP / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-20vs Callahan/JB/3OaksWon 21
L#1 DoublesDoug Meyer / Dana Bennett vs Don Threm / Charles Combs3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesFred Brown / Doug Williams vs Mark Jumper / Stan Brummett6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStephen Rowell / Pete Owens vs Robert Lee / Barry Callahan6-1, 6-2
2024-10-20vs Callahan/JB/3OaksWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Myers / Kevin Dugan vs Don Threm / Charles Combs4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPete Biagioni / Dana Bennett vs Mark Jumper / Stan Brummett7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPaul Bowersock / Elliot Esmaeilpour vs Robert Lee / Jimmy Gaither6-1, 6-2
2024-10-19vs Callahan/JB/3OaksWon 20
W#2 DoublesPete Biagioni / Pete Owens vs Robert Lee / Jimmy Gaither6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPaul Bowersock / Kevin Dugan vs Mark Jumper / Stan Brummett6-1, 6-4
2024-10-19vs Callahan/JB/3OaksLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephen Rowell / Elliot Esmaeilpour vs Don Threm / Charles Combs3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDoug Meyer / Doug Williams vs Mark Jumper / Stan Brummett3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesFred Brown / Dana Bennett vs Robert Lee / Barry Callahan6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men - LOCAL LEAGUE AT STATE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Paul Bowersock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Fred Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Doug Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Pete Owens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Kevin Dugan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Elliot Esmaeilpour
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Pete Biagioni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen Rowell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tracy Pearsall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Dugan + Elliot Esmaeilpour134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Bowersock
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Fred Brown
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Doug Meyer
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Pete Owens
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.86
Kevin Dugan
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Elliot Esmaeilpour
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
Pete Biagioni
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Rowell
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracy Pearsall
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.