Teams

Cheval Aces and Eights - N. Martinez

2022 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 and Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.08 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-26vs River Hills - B. DeBrockeLost 01
L#2 DoublesPeter Marsocci / Kristin McCormick vs Jaime Villegas / Elisa Buffington3-6, 4-6
2022-03-06vs River Hills - B. DeBrockeWon 10
W#2 DoublesKristin McCormick / Peter Marsocci vs Michael Quinn / Brigitte Paola5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-27vs Lake Padgett - S. RoyLost 01
L#3 DoublesHeidi Milan / Stephen McCormick vs Holly Charles / Darin Garner7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesHeidi Milan / Craig Arndt vs Margarita Colon / Michael Rossi6-1, 6-3
2022-02-18vs PC Mixed NutsWon 10
W#2 DoublesCasey Gates / Craig Arndt vs Sonya Braudway / John Johnson6-2, 6-2
2022-02-04vs Hills - HCC 8.0 Mixed/HelmeSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPeter Marsocci / Kristin McCormick vs Tibbie Farnsworth / Clark MacCullough3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNatalie Martinez / Craig Arndt vs Christina Dausch / Richard Helme6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-31vs Lake Padgett - S. RoyLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristin McCormick / Peter Marsocci vs Rhonda Mendoza / Albert Alhadeff4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesHeidi Milan / Craig Arndt vs Marie Bialousz / Paul Zack2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPeter Marsocci / Kristin McCormick vs Denise Saltman / Michael Rossi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Craig Arndt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Abbe Malone
published 4.5
4.24
Farheen Aldeen
published 4.5
3.75
Peter Marsocci
published
3.68
Natalie Martinez
published
3.61
Karen Abrams
published
3.49
Casey Gates
published 4
3.48
Kristin McCormick
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.22
Heidi Milan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jason Crow
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Craig Arndt
65W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Abbe Malone
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Farheen Aldeen
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Peter Marsocci
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
Natalie Martinez
24W–23L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Karen Abrams
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Casey Gates
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Kristin McCormick
105W–82L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Heidi Milan
82W–157L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Jason Crow
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.