Teams

ELW Fries

2022 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Weekend Winter · 7.0 W Saturday

5 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-26vs Treasure Bay FrickeLost 01
L#1 DoublesAna Jara / Noella Burgeson vs Anne Remie / Elise Gilbert7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-03-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Petracco / Martha Cornatzer vs Ann Lea / Dorothy Rizzo3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-19vs Treasure Bay FrickeLost 02
L#1 DoublesNoela Fries / Martha Cornatzer vs Arlene Fricke / Anne Remie6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNoella Burgeson / Kimberly Ankney vs Elise Gilbert / Beth Walters2-6, 3-6
2022-02-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Ann Petracco vs Bea Lynch / Helen Rothberg6-2, 6-2
2022-02-19vs Pinellas - Tarpon/HellmersLost 01
L#3 DoublesAna Jara / Noella Burgeson vs Joan Johnson / Karen Cady3-6, 4-6
2022-02-12Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJoanne Dickson / Ana Jara vs Susan Evans / Kelly Lang Cook2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNoela Fries / Kimberly Ankney vs Ann Lea / Stacy Perry2-6, 2-6
2022-01-30vs Countryside MahlerLost 03
L#1 DoublesAna Jara / Christine Milligan vs Karen Dee / Lisa Mahler6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNoela Fries / Martha Cornatzer vs Dina Glover / Linda Anderson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNoella Burgeson / Kimberly Ankney vs Lisa Lowe / Debra Gross6-7, 6-7
2022-01-22vs ELW UselisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAnn Petracco / Martha Cornatzer vs Jane Gebhart / Sherry Knitter6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCharlene Bartlett / Kimberly Ankney vs Paula Uselis / Kathy Lowenstein2-6, 4-6
2022-01-15vs Pinellas - Tarpon/HellmersLost 01
L#3 DoublesCharlene Bartlett / Martha Cornatzer vs Pamela Cotillo / Ellan Hubbard2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Noella Burgeson
published
3.08
Martha Cornatzer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.04
Ana Jara
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Noela Fries
published
2.53
Kimberly Ankney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Jara + Kimberly Ankney4545% games−8.4% vs expected
Ana Jara + Martha Cornatzer3546% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Ankney + Martha Cornatzer4256% gamesnot enough data
Ana Jara + Noella Burgeson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noella Burgeson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Martha Cornatzer
117W–130L career · 6 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Ana Jara
47W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Noela Fries
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Kimberly Ankney
76W–159L career · 4 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.