Teams

Flight 3: Henize

2026 EMA 18-39 League · 18-39 Winchester-2 2026

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · 18-39 Winchester-2 2026
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Flight 3: Henize07182424248
2Flight 2:MacOmber07162525263
3Flight 1: Bassel/Deng08311616213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anuraag Gopaluni
published 4
3.33
Lauren Nardacci
published
3.26
Amber Topping
published 3.5
3.23
Marissa Chen
published
Kenneth Pham
published
Zoe Jiang
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anuraag Gopaluni
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Nardacci
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Amber Topping
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Marissa Chen
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Kenneth Pham
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Zoe Jiang
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.