Teams

KY/LEX/Azbell

2023 USTA SPRING FUN LEAGUE 18 & Over · Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jennifer Gieselman
published
3.89
Camille Morrow
published 4
3.85
Katie Parrish
published
3.66
Erin Azbell
published
3.59
Margot Melchiode
published
3.34
Jordan Reeves
published
3.32
Rose Knight
published
3.29
Rachael Carroll
published
Darya Droz
published 3.5
3.13
Carlyn Moore
published 3.5
3.12
Stephanie Queen
published
3.11
Lauren Saini
published
2.94
Holly Howard
published
Laura Kirkley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Azbell + Jordan Reeves15361% games+11.2% vs expected
Katie Parrish + Camille Morrow10461% games+3.3% vs expected
Rose Knight + Stephanie Queen2451% games+2.6% vs expected
Rose Knight + Holly Howard123 matchesnot enough data
Laura Kirkley + Carlyn Moore303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Gieselman
16W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Camille Morrow
22W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
Katie Parrish
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.85
Erin Azbell
23W–7L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Margot Melchiode
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Jordan Reeves
17W–4L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.34
Rose Knight
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Rachael Carroll
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Darya Droz
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carlyn Moore
12W–33L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Stephanie Queen
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
Lauren Saini
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11
Holly Howard
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.94
Laura Kirkley
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.