Teams

SGV Deuces Wild-Shen-Scholl Cyn-SA3

2025 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 2.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesKaihong Su / Jane Lee vs Noanie Rofoli / Cristina Siruno2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAmi Sin vs Kathleen Makarewicz2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Liu / Stacey McCarroll vs Moira Demos / Aimee Devaul4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTiffany Sin vs Tina Lu1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSherlyn Burns / Melicia Shen vs Shana Lutker / Deborah Beveridge6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-05-11vs SGV Arcadia Aces-Li-Arcadia-Sa3/5Lost 14
L#1 DoublesKaren Clancy / Austen Rachlis vs Miki Makiko Shimizu / Mylinh Crew3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKaihong Su vs Maya Joko6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnnie Pham / Melicia Shen vs Jessica Chan / Esther Fernandez6-7, 4-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSandra Arroyo vs Sabrina Chang2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDiane Wai / Stacey McCarroll vs Keiko Handman / Elsa Busch0-6, 1-6
2025-05-03vs SGV HFA Girls-Higuera-Downey HS/SA9Split 22
L#1 DoublesSandra Arroyo / Glorimar Brown vs Megumi Kodama / Ariana Garcia4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmi Sin / Sandra Liu vs Lisa Santana / Vanessa Vanda0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAnnie Pham vs Efe Oghoghome6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSherlyn Burns / Jessie Do vs Adriana Higuera / Kylie Sanchez4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Jessie Do
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Kaihong Su
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Melicia Shen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Austen Rachlis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Annie Pham
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Ami Sin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.58
Tiffany Sin
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.49
Sandra Liu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Stacey McCarroll
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Theresa Thoits
published
Diane Wai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Christina Rosario
published 2.5
Glorimar Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Clancy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Arroyo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Sherlyn Burns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Austen Rachlis + Jessie Do2348% games+1.3% vs expected
Stacey McCarroll + Sandra Liu0528% games−4.2% vs expected
Austen Rachlis + Melicia Shen1446% gamesnot enough data
Melicia Shen + Jessie Do303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessie Do
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Kaihong Su
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Melicia Shen
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Austen Rachlis
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Annie Pham
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Ami Sin
3W–8L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Tiffany Sin
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Sandra Liu
3W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
Stacey McCarroll
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.42
Theresa Thoits
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40
2.5
Diane Wai
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Christina Rosario
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Glorimar Brown
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Karen Clancy
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Arroyo
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherlyn Burns
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.