Teams

SD 3.0 Coronado HS (2:3)/ Nelson

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Women - 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Jennie Vandenakker vs Maricarmen Inchaurrandieta / Doris Schmied4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Holzer / Claudia Nelson vs Susan Storm / Marlis Vermehren6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-24vs SD 3.0 La Jolla B&TC (3:2)/ KhouryLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Holzer / Claudia Nelson vs Natalie Willoughby / Alexis MacMillan2-6, 1-6
2023-05-17vs SD LLW 3.0 Peninsula TC/ WoodLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Holzer / Jennie Vandenakker vs Au-Co MAI / Miller McCord2-6, 0-6
2023-05-10vs SD 3.0 Coronado HS (2:3)/ EscobedoLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Holzer / Jennie Vandenakker vs Kristi Gottlieb / Claudia Garcia6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dahlgren vs Debora Rozen2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-03vs SD 3.0 Coronado TC (2:3)/ AndersonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Holzer / Lisa Givens vs Lyle Anderson / Leslie Vinton6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2023-04-26Lost 02
L#1 DoublesClaudia Nelson / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Kelly Wilson / Tania Lancaster2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAmy Holzer vs Anna Thomas3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-19vs SD 3.0 Mtn View (3:2)/ StanleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Holzer / Karin Copp vs Brenda Henriquez / Irma Ibarra6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-12vs SD 3.0 La Jolla TC (3:2)/ BrunoWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Holzer / Jennie Vandenakker vs Christine Cernosia / Yumi Miyamoto6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Dahlgren vs Jessica Shehab7-6, 6-1
2023-04-05vs SD 3.0 Balboa TC (3:2:)/ ObrochtaLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Holzer / Claudia Nelson vs Katrina Peterson / Janet Bergland6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Elizabeth Dahlgren
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Brittney Emerson
published 3
2.94
Karin Copp
published
2.82
Amy Holzer
usually #1 Doubles 68%, also #2 Doubles 16% · published 3
2.77
Claudia Nelson
published 3
2.63
Lisa Givens
published
2.60
Leslie Harrison
published
2.30
Jane Lithopoulos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Holzer + Karin Copp3251% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Dahlgren
85W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3
Brittney Emerson
26W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.26
Karin Copp
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Amy Holzer
80W–104L career · 19 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Claudia Nelson
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Lisa Givens
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.63
Leslie Harrison
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jane Lithopoulos
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.